|
Question
|
TooSteep: November 03 2005
|
|
Vertical jump improvement routines/exercises?
|
|
I'm sure this must have been addressed here before, but a forum search on 'vertical jump' does not return any meaningful results.
Does anyone here know of a proven routine for improving ones vertical jump? Would it be suitable for 40+ athletes? How about a routine suitable for 9 year olds?
Thanks a lot for any help/links/articles etc...
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 04 2005
|
|
Frankie,
Your advice is sound. I would differ on the recommendation of double swings for VJ, however. I know that the double is because with DD bells one is limited to 106lb. In principle, double swings develop excellent posterior chain develop as is needed for a good vert.
However I think the width of stance necessary to do double KB swings takes one out of the optimal groove for a maximal VJ. I would modify to recommend using 1 KB as heavy as possible for the rep range sought. An option for this would be a plate loadable or shot-loadable bell, which can be loaded to 200+ lbs. May be semantics, but the width of stance is a critical factor.
Lacking a heavier single bell, and opting for double KB swings, as a 'corrective measure' I would follow the double swings immediately with a few single of BW hip-shoulder-width stance VJs to reinforce or etch the proper groove.
Follow the logic?
Steve
|
|
|
|
Question
|
TooSteep: November 03 2005
|
|
Vertical jump improvement routines/exercises?
|
|
I'm sure this must have been addressed here before, but a forum search on 'vertical jump' does not return any meaningful results.
Does anyone here know of a proven routine for improving ones vertical jump? Would it be suitable for 40+ athletes? How about a routine suitable for 9 year olds?
Thanks a lot for any help/links/articles etc...
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 04 2005
|
|
do double swings close-stance outside of the legs, a la Donnie Thompson.
However, most people seem to have trouble with the outside the legs version, and the struggle with flow would make it counterproductive for many.
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Frankie: November 04 2005
|
|
MAGIC: My 2nd Z-Health Appointment with Dr. Eric Cobb
|
|
I had my 2nd Z-Health Appointment with Dr. Eric Cobb today. It had been a couple months since my last appt and had been practicing my Z Health RX religiously.
While I had some good progress with Dr. Cobb during my first appt., I was unable to replicate that success consistently on my own which led me to believe one of two things was going wrong.
1. Incorrect form on my part
2. Incomplete diagnosis on Dr. Cobb's
I was right on both counts.
To defend Dr. Cobb, our first session was too short for him to do a full assessment and prescription. This time, he had enough time to do a full assessment and prescription. Now to the good part: He gave me one cue...and my whole world changed.
My world has been "roaming" residual muscle tension in adductors, hip flexor, TFL, glute medius, piriformis and erector spinae. Imagine walking, runinng and standing and never being able to relax. More specifically, I drag my right leg in gait/running and rotate to my right in both unilateral and bilateral motion.
Dr. Cobb said, "When you walk, I want you to look up and to the left and only with your eyes - not your head." As I am walking, I start feeling less and less RMT in my affected areas...could it be? Omigod, I can walk!
To the best of my understanding,
here is why:
Within the CNS there lies the:
Oculomotor System (eyes)
Vestibular System (eyes-ears)
Proprioceptor System (the rest of the body)
The body follows the eyes. Show me someone who flexes/slouches and I'll show you someone who looks down.
With my initial Z RX, Dr. Cobb had me training all 3 systems simultaneously. While I had some neurological / structural benefit, I had no symptom relief. This approach was too integrated for me.
(I am not characterizing this accurately. The isolation 2 integration model is the best way I know to describe it.)
So, Dr. Cobb started at the beginning and isolated the eyes. Sure enough, that is where the problem was originating. As I understand it, as soon as the eyes are "clear", we'll move further into integration.
EVERYTHING obeys the CNS. Most corrective exerise/flexibility/bodywork ignores this. True, at times, there are structural bottlenecks. These bottlenecks can be affected by CNS work. Even after structural issues are addressed, the CNS has to be re-educated correctly.
Z Health is a much more involved approach to joint mobility. It doesn't take the poison tasting route of building tolerance to problem movements. Instead, it educates correct movement.
If you have pain that joint(s) mobility, balance/stability training, exercise, flexibility and soft tissue work hasn't taken care of, Z-Health has to be on your check list of things to try.
I recommend getting the R-Phase program just to learn the exercises and setup a personal appt with Dr. Cobb or one of his trainers to receive a personal prescription.
Josh Henkin or anyone else with experience with Z-Health, neurology / motor learning, please clarify anything I might have characterized incorrectly or too simply.
Better movement,
Frankie
Z Health
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 04 2005
|
|
I was very intrigued and impressed by a recent presentation that Dr. Cobb gave.
He is the subject of an interview in a forthcoming Full KOntact newsletter.
Your experience with Dr. Cobb and him knowing which 'button to push' reminds me of the story:
A production line was shut down and no one on staff new how to fix it. Business came to a halt and the company was losing money by the second. So the foreman called in an expert.
The expert came in and took a look at the machinery. After a minute he said "I can fix it." "My fee is $1,000,000"
Well, they agreed to the price and he pulled out a screwdriver and turned one screw a 1/4 turn and the production line started up again.
The foreman balked and said "$1,000,000 just to turn a screw?!"
The expert said "No, I only charged you $1 to turn the screw" "The other $999,999 is for knowing which screw to turn".
That's why I always try to seek out the best teachers in life. You always get value for value.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Dan36oy: November 04 2005
|
|
Strength training for women...resources
|
|
Can anyone recommend any good online resources/routines geared towards women? We have access to a university gym with the standard free weights and numerous machines, but no kettlebells. Goals include fat loss, strength and general conditioning. Searching for something along the lines of M/W/F for strength training and we'll be doing various endurance/conditioning activities T/Th/Sat.
Aside from sound nutrition, does heavy/low reps or circuit style training have an advantage over the other for the typically-stereotyped goals of the average woman (i.e. fat loss/cosmo physique)?
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 04 2005
|
|
which is better is very individualistic.
It would depend on her starting point, adaptation rates (influenced by metabolic and hormonal influences, genetics and other factors).
Also, I don't think it is fair to say that there are typical-steortypical goals either. At least not so much any longer, and not so much on this forum.
Gone are the days in which women didn't train for strength, but only to 'fit in a certain dress size'. Of course, some never evolve beyond the 'Balley's ideal' which is fine I suppose.
Very difficult to get useful instructions specific to one's goals, without providing detailed specific's about that individual.
Your best course of action would be to seek a qualified instructor for person-person training. In lieu of that a few good instructional resources and some consulting with a pro via online programs, etc would be time well spent. The investment is in the education.
There are at least a handful of exceptional trainers here, several of which would be willing to provide some specific guidance.
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Dan36oy: November 04 2005
|
|
Strength training for women...resources
|
|
Can anyone recommend any good online resources/routines geared towards women? We have access to a university gym with the standard free weights and numerous machines, but no kettlebells. Goals include fat loss, strength and general conditioning. Searching for something along the lines of M/W/F for strength training and we'll be doing various endurance/conditioning activities T/Th/Sat.
Aside from sound nutrition, does heavy/low reps or circuit style training have an advantage over the other for the typically-stereotyped goals of the average woman (i.e. fat loss/cosmo physique)?
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 05 2005
|
|
in lieu of KBs, it is still worthwhile to study the swing, snatch, OH Squat, press, renegade rows, windmill, TGU and the like with DBs. Then get a KB and either bring it to the gym and back or train at home with it.
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Marty RKC: November 14 2005
|
|
Home in NJ. Back from Russia
|
|
Long story short Christine's blog and Steve Cotter's explanation summed everything up. What an event it was with so much going on with the media, 15 nations and 150 competitors!
Made a lot of new friends and strengthed bonds with existing ones.
As far as our numbers having been better, it was irrelevant given the knowledge superiority demonstrated by the other athletes we went up against. Hopefully we will improve enough to be on the level but what amazed us was the mutual respect given by each of the champions. Warrior to warrior! Antoine(Man who did 155 Jerks in 10 minutes at 80 kg class) whom I took a picture with gave me the trophy he won to hold for the picture. No words to describe it. Humility is not a strong enough word for someone like him to do that. A true champion.
Marty RKC
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 15 2005
|
|
Marty,
Glad to hear you are home safe and sound. We are in St. Pete--crazy good times.
It was incredible and awesome to share in this experience with you.
You made us proud and the coaches spoke highly about your potential in this sport. I am proud to call you my brother.
Talk soon,
Stevenovich
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Reuben: November 17 2005
|
|
ATTN: Members in Germany or Poland
|
|
I will be in Bremnhaven (Germany) n Gdinya (Poland)for the next 6+ months. Are there any members there and where can i pick up kettlebells in those places - I need 1 or 2 24 kg (48 lbs) kbs. Old ones are ok.
Any good strength training resources in either place anyone knows about?
Thanks
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 17 2005
|
|
Reuben,
I am not German, but did meet some German KB athletes at the GS World Championships in Moscow last week.
One of our new friends is Stefan Falke. Stefan prefers conventional mail. His address is
Daenenweg 40
Ahrensburg, Germany 22926
He is a very nice and very strong guy, and I am sure he can point you in the right direction. If you connect with him, please tell him Steve Cotter and the rest of the USA team say hello.
Good luck.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Taking Cattle: November 23 2005
|
|
secrets of gold medal sports performance training
|
|
Catchy title, huh?
I'm pasting this article from the Supertraining list on Yahoo. It's a fascinating read, especially (to me) the bit about volume being the enemy of speed (point 15).
"I am currently the Strength and Conditioning Coach for the Australian
National Sprint Cycling Team and have been for about five years. I am also
the Strength Scientist for the South Australian Sports Institute in
Adelaide, Australia, where the National Sprint Program is based. In
addition, for "fun", I help coach a group of developmental sprint cyclists,
which form the core of our SA State Sprint team and half of whom are now in
the Top 10 sprinters in Australia, which would make them National champions
in all but a handful of countries and, when I get time, I roll around the
track myself.
Some points (for free):
1. We don't keep any secrets from anyone, including the Poms, the Frogs, Ze
Germans or the Yanks. In fact, people just generally don't believe what we
tell them, disagree or their programs (or minds) are too set in concrete to
change. We invite other top riders to train with us and they get faster, but
they go home and do the same old thing. The Head Coach, support staff and I
are happy to tell anyone and everyone what we do. We usually just don't get
time to sit around on chat rooms or make social chit chat on E-mail, let
alone write a book.
What Charlie Walsh and Gary West used to do with our sprinters when they
were the Head Coaches was state of the art at the time and they are both
great coaches. You will not find anyone in Australian Cycling who will
question that or say a word against what they did at the time, but times
have changed and those methods are not quite enough to consistently hit the
top spots now, although you can still be troublesome internationally if
you've got natural speed. The top speeds have gone to a new level and to
reach that level, you have to specialise your sprint riders more. I'm sure
if Charlie and Westy were still coaching the Oz team, they wouldn't be doing
exactly the same things they were doing ten years ago. They are too smart
for that.
Most of what we do is based on methods and research that have been around
for decades but have not been applied to cycling. It has mostly been used in
athletics and we have copied a lot from that and what the French and Germans
have done at various times. The Brits were formerly coached by our current
Head Track Coach, so they do a lot of similar things too. What the Dutch are
doing now, I'm not sure, but they were mostly all speed skaters before they
were top cyclists, so maybe there's something in that.
2. We are constantly trying new things and changing what we do, so what we
do this year will be different to what we did last year and so on. Australia
is a small country and is competing with some real powerhouses in terms of
talent pools, resources and money that we can't even dream of matching, so
we have to be a step ahead or we're not in the race.
3. What sprinters did 10 years ago is completely different to what most of
the top sprinters are doing now. The critical factors that determine success
or failure have changed. Tactics have changed and the tournament formats
have changed. Training that would win 10 years ago is generally not as
successful today, but every dog has his or her day and some old-school
trainers still come out on top now and again, but it is happening less and
less.
4. Our philosophy is simple. Most events are speed endurance. To win you
need to go faster for longer than the other guy or gal. Some riders are
better at faster, some are better at longer, but they generally need a bit
of both. To have speed endurance, first you need speed. If you can't ride
5.0 for a flying 100m, you won't ride 10.1 for a 200m. Speed is hard to
train and takes a long time. Endurance is easy by comparison and we just
chuck that on at the end. To get up to speed, you need acceleration and that
means power. Power is a combination of strength and speed. The speed part
you get on the track, the strength you get in the gym. Low cadence power
(0-120rpm or so) we can train in the gym too, but high cadence power
(120-200rpm) is too fast to do in the gym and you generally need to be
chasing a maniac on a motorbike (e.g., our Head Coach) down the bank to
increase that. Or at least, someone faster than you to break the wind so you
can go overspeed.
5. Aerobic Capacity (VO2max, AT) is the base for enduros, strength is the
base for sprinters. We do three gym sessions and two track sessions for most
of the year. Road is just for recovery, to keep them a little bit lean and
to keep the sprinters out of the pub and out of trouble. It is generally a
max of 2hrs, but mostly only 1 and is very easy - talking the whole time.
6. When strength is the focus, we don't care what numbers they pump out on
track, just what they lift. When power or speed is the focus, we back the
gym off (2/wk and easier sessions) so we can get the numbers we want on the
track (3-4/wk). Generally, half the year is spent focussed on strength and
half on power and speed (roughly - depends on competitive calendar) although
we always train a bit of everything, it's just the proportion of each that
changes. The strength work is not all done in one block. We cycle through
strength, power and speed at least twice per year.
7. Gym is generally 3-4sets of 3 max lower body strength or power lifts -
early in the phase, two strength and one power, later, two power and one
strength. I don't use cleans, jerks or snatches with our current riders -
they are too technical for maximal efforts unless you have years of
experience. We do one bilateral strength lift each session for "core"
strength (Squat, Deadlift, Romanian Deadlift) - usually lower back is the
limiting factor not legs and this is the only reason I use these lifts - for
back strength in standing starts. The rest of the lifts are unilateral. How
many feet do you push each pedal with at one time? If you train bilaterally
you get stronger bilaterally and unilateral strength lags behind. If you
train unilaterally, you get stronger unilaterally. It's a neural thing.
Single-leg Press is our bread and butter. Different foot and hip positions
for different phases of pedal stroke, standing, seated, etc. I use high
speed video to match joint angles and velocities for each rider. We mainly
do it ballistically for power - throw the sled as far as you can - at
different percentages of max to match up to different muscle contraction
velocities for different phases of the acceleration (different cadences). We
do a lot of single-leg plyos on boxes, stairs, bunjee sleds, etc during
speed phases. Strength and power gains are extremely specific and do not
necessarily transfer well. When Ryan Bayley beat Sean Eadie in the
Commonwealth Games sprint final in 2002, Sean was tripling 250kg for a
parallel back squat and Ryan was tripling 120kg. On single-leg press, they
were much closer (20kg) and so was the racing.
Single-leg squats (front and back) and deadlifts usually make up the third
exercise and are as much for pelvic stability as strength. I'm going to try
single-leg pulls and cleans this year, but these will not be our primary
power exercises - more of a preparation for the work before Beijing. We have
done SL squats, deadlifts and pulls for years now and the riders are pretty
stable. An example of numbers - our best single-leg squat figures are 3 @
165kg on each leg (just over 360lbs). The weakest of the girls (who just
entered the squad this year) is 3 @ 80kg on each leg, but she only weighs
about 50kg. Two riders have done the 165kg so far. We have riders who can do
sets of standing hops onto 1m+ boxes. The lowest is for one of the girls and
is a 70cm box for sets of 8 each leg.
8. Upper body, we do two exercise per session (a push and a pull in the same
plane of movement, different each day) in general prep and two per week in
specific prep (both pulls) so they can keep hold of the handlebars in
standing starts. The girls are starting to push themselves off the bike,
their legs are so strong (around 3 @ 250kg on each leg for the girls and up
to 350kg for the guys on SLP). Abs and core, we do two per session - one
mainly flexion, one mainly extension. Some have rotational or lateral
components, but not isometric holds or pilates mumbo jumbo. If their "core
stability" is poor, they wouldn't be able to squat on one leg. Lying on the
ground and waving your legs in the air doesn't transfer to the bike. That
might annoy the physio's and guru's who make money out of Swiss balls and
all that stuff, but I tried it for three years in 20 different sports and it
didn't make any difference to performance or injury rates. They get really
good at balancing on a ball, but there's no Olympic event for that. It
doesn't transfer to the sport. Fix their technical problems in the actual
technique (soapbox time is now over).
9. A Gym session lasts about 2.5-3 hours for 6 or 7 exercises, a maximum of
33 sets including 12 warm-ups sets, so that's about one set every six
minutes or more on average. We don't set maximum rests, just minimums. If
they need longer to get their heads in gear, they take it. Ryan Bayley is
the slowest trainer in the world. Lucky he's so bloody fast, they'll pay my
bill to sit there and talk about muscle cars and heavy metal music. Reps are
a maximum of 6 for strength, and 4 - 15 for power (less for high percentages
- 60-70% max, more for low percentages - 20%, or BW for plyos) Total
contraction time for a set (not counting hang time in the air) is around
6-8s max - phosphate energy system all the way. Minimum of 2 min rest, but
that is never in danger. Only the phosphate energy system can deliver energy
fast enough for maximal work and you've got about 8s max.
10. On the track they take about 3 hours for 3 or 4 efforts including half
hour warm-up routine - same as pre-race warm-up. Warm-up, change gears,
roll-up, effort, roll down 20-30min rest, roll-up, effort, etc. Lot's more
rest. Rest usually consists of sitting on their arses, paying out on each
other, drinking Coca Cola (sponsorship please - the Coke bill is killing us)
and the occasional chocolate cake. This is especially good when there is a
joint sprinter/enduro training session. (Enduros don't get any cake -
they're too paranoid about body fat). In general prep phase, the sprinters
ride to track and gym (15-20min easy each way) and in spec prep, they drive.
Each track effort is no longer than about 15s and usually less than 10s.
Again, mainly phosphate system.
11. The one thing we do that most coaches can't cop is this. If you don't
make the target times or loads on the first effort or set, you warm down and
go home. You aren't fresh enough to train at a level that will make you
improve. If you do a PB, you warm down and go home. If you are on fire that
much you can blow yourself to pieces in a couple of sets or efforts and it
will take weeks to dig you out of the hole you put yourself in, so whatever
it is, if you PB, you stop and come back next time. This philosophy takes
everyone a while to accept, but it works. When we don't follow the rules, if
we let someone pump out a series of PBs in one session, they are almost
invariably wrecked for weeks afterwards and we never get close to quality
training during that time. Sometimes, you can see it coming, but sometimes
it just comes out of the blue. When it does, warm down, go home. Sometimes,
at lower levels you can get away with it, but the better you get, the more
capacity you have to exceed your normal limits, the more this becomes
important. Enduros don't need to do this. Everything is submaximal.
12. In general prep, the sprinters might do 2 x 1hr easy aerobic/coffee
rides per week and an easier recovery ride on days off (unless the're too
fat, then they might do 2hrs and less chocolate cake). This year, we are
doing a total of six aerobic development rides (over Christmas - fat time).
In spec prep, they just do the recovery rides.
13. We generally always do track after gym. Gym in mornings (8:30am-11/12)
track in the arvo (2:30/3pm-5:30/6pm). If the gym session is too hard, it
will bugger them for track. As I said, for about half the year, we don't
care. For the other half, I water down the gym so the track work is 100%.
There is some short term potentiation from doing some maximal strength or
power efforts but the research is not clear on time frames since everyone
does something different. This is one thing we are looking at. If we do two
maximal power ergo tests (6s with 4-5min recovery), the second one is always
much better. The same has been shown with some contrast-loading studies on
squats and plyos, etc., but an equal number of studies have shown no effect.
The time courses and stimuli are always different though, so it's hard to
compare. I think there's something in it so if you find something that works
for you, go with it. The exception is start sessions. We never do standing
starts after gym. If we do, they are always crap sessions.
14. Coming up to the major comp for the year (Worlds or Olympics), we slot
in a speed endurance block. This involves the addition of some longer
sustained efforts or sets of short efforts with low recovery once or twice
per week, usually one on an ergo and one on the track. This increases the
muscles ability to buffer hydrogen ions from the anaerobic glycolysis energy
pathway that you have to rely on when the phosphates run out and increases
the enzyme capacity of that pathway as well, so it can run at a higher
level. Adaptation is relatively fast and 6-8wks will usually give a massive
increase in this capacity.
15. Here's the logic.
Volume is a speed killer. It doesn't matter what you do, if you do a lot, it
will make you slower. The protein in your muscles (myosin heavy chain
isoforms for those who know their molecular biology) will change to a
slower, more endurance friendly type if you do too much volume. This is
individually variable, but two sessions every day of anything will make you
slower as will lots of aerobic work. You might still be fast for an enduro,
but in sprinter terms, you're still slow.
Going slow makes you slow. If you want to be able to go faster, then going
at less than maximal speed generally won't do it. If it does, then you
weren't operating at 100% before. That's OK. Most people can't switch
everything on. You have to practice it. It takes years to reach your 100%
level even without any actual physiological improvement. Most sprint events
require sustained power output at cadences over 160rpm. If you don't
practice this, you won't get good at it. Most people will spend all their
bickies just getting up to 160rpm on a decent gear, so to train maximally at
that level, you have to get up to 160rpm without using up your phosphate
stores. That's where the motor bike comes in. Use the slipstream to get up
to max speed or over and then spend your bickies. That way you work
maximally at maximal speed. You have to train your nervous system to
coordinate your muscular contractions at that speed.
Same in the gym. If all you do is slow, heavy. You get STRONG and SLOW. You
need to do most of your work at race speeds using submaximal loads but at
high speeds. If you can't do single-leg stuff, then Olympic pulling
movements are your next best option, but unloaded plyos are more important
for higher cadences. You don't need to be able to clean or snatch or jerk.
The pull phase from the floor to full hip and knee extension is where the
gains come from. What happens after that doesn't matter. You can throw the
bar out of the window and the gains will be the same. I would only recommend
this on your last rep as most gym owners get quite irate about their
equipment being heaved out into the street, as do passing pedestrians. The
overspeed work will come as you try to get away.
Use your maximum capacities at the maximum rate and in as specific a way as
possible to transfer to the bike. I can outlift all our top riders in the
gym and out-power them on the ergo, but I'm not in the race on the track. I
can't put my power through the bike into the track. I'm just not technically
as good as they are. Ryan Bayley may look like a monkey humping a tennis
ball when he sprints but most of his power is getting onto the track.
...
Weight training for enduros - the same strategies apply but maximal strength
and power are less critical. All endurance riding, even the bunch sprint at
the end, is really submaximal. A little bit of gym regularly helps to
maintain the structural integrity of the body, prevent imbalances and
prepare you for crashes, but the real gains come on the road. Racing is the
best training. All our best track enduros race on the road in Europe. They
come together for camps to touch up their track skills, but all of that was
learnt as juniors and in domestic track racing on the way up. For strength
endurance on the bike, ride up hills in the saddle on bigger gears. That was
the only strength work out team pursuit did for the last three years and
they won everything there was to win with a bucket load of world records to
boot. Incidentally, they are also the fastest starters."
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 24 2005
|
|
is that what they are calling 'single-leg squat' is not the same as what we refer to as pistol.
Usually, single leg squat refers to more like an airborne lunge where the free leg is kept behind the squatting leg.
Still, the weights discussed are very strong, but one can do much heavier loads with a 'single leg squat' than in a pistol, due to the levers and distribution of loads being much more on the stronger quads and activate the abdominals much more. The pistols rely much more on hip flexor and hamstrings.
I could be wrong, but I have found that most referring to 'single leg squats' are talking about a different exercise. Valuable in either case.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Marty RKC: November 23 2005
|
|
152/152 snatches with 3/4 pood in 10 minutes
|
|
Next step is 1 pood. I'm not sure because it has a larger handle.
I'll shoot for 150/150. Get ready for it to hit the fan as it always does with heavier weight.
My goal for this was 150/150.
Ladies who are interested in GS, I will go as far as to say snatch for 10 minutes with a 1/4 pood just to get a PR to see where you stand. Work up to your way with 1 pood eventually. Just my opinion.
Marty RKC
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 24 2005
|
|
jerks, my second meet I did 10 jerks. It took me ten years to get 100 ". So said a very nice Russian girevik, one of the few who spoke good English. This after he (seemingly) effortlessly put up 108 with 2x32kg. Oh, and he was 60kg in BW. He didn't think he was anything special either.
He said just stick with it. Patience is indeed the secret. Oh, and coaching helps, but we do what we can.
I'm never afraid to learn. My ego will never be shattered because I don't take myself so seriously. We are all babes in the eyes of the lord or something like that.
You wrote, "BUT I'LL BE THERE ONE DAY!!!" I'm going to hold you to that.
Please contact me when you have the chance: steve@fullkontact.com
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Marty RKC: November 23 2005
|
|
152/152 snatches with 3/4 pood in 10 minutes
|
|
Next step is 1 pood. I'm not sure because it has a larger handle.
I'll shoot for 150/150. Get ready for it to hit the fan as it always does with heavier weight.
My goal for this was 150/150.
Ladies who are interested in GS, I will go as far as to say snatch for 10 minutes with a 1/4 pood just to get a PR to see where you stand. Work up to your way with 1 pood eventually. Just my opinion.
Marty RKC
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 24 2005
|
|
Paul,
The most I've ever done in 10:00 was 100 jerks with 2x32kg in multiple sets, and the most ever in 1 set was 60 reps.
Things were put into perspective when I saw Anton Anasenko of Russia, at a BW of under 80kg do 155 jerks in a 10:00 set! That is more than 1 jerks every 4 seconds. And of course 90kg + Ivan Denisov of Russia did 175 jerks in a 10:00 set, 1 jerk per 3.4 seconds! (I personally was more impressed/intrigued with the lighter man's performance, but that is basically a tomato/tomatoe thing).
Thanks a lot for your encouragement!
Steve
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Marty RKC: November 23 2005
|
|
152/152 snatches with 3/4 pood in 10 minutes
|
|
Next step is 1 pood. I'm not sure because it has a larger handle.
I'll shoot for 150/150. Get ready for it to hit the fan as it always does with heavier weight.
My goal for this was 150/150.
Ladies who are interested in GS, I will go as far as to say snatch for 10 minutes with a 1/4 pood just to get a PR to see where you stand. Work up to your way with 1 pood eventually. Just my opinion.
Marty RKC
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 24 2005
|
|
30 rpms is a great pace. If you can sustain that with 1 pood that would be close to the upper limit. When my hands heal up I will try the same.
Anything 24 rpm or more with any size weight is moving. When you take into account lock-out there has got to be an upper limit of about 26-27 rpm with the 32kg girya, and I don't believe that has ever been achieved in comp for 10:00 (135/135 on average).
This will be fun to look back on some day.
|
|
|
|
Question
|
mspkfv: November 25 2005
|
|
Q for Steve Cotter
|
|
Steve is your new DVD set ready for purchase? If not when? If so where?
Kurt
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 25 2005
|
|
Hi Kurt,
Thanks for your inquiry. The Encyclopedia of Kettlebell Lifting is now ready for purchase, or if not today, will be early next week. There will be a lot of different distributors, so my preference would be that you give the sale to Dragon Door. I have to work out the details with John DuCane, but I would expect them to be available herevery soon.
You may see some clips and add copy now if you like at the below website, which is a site devoted specifically to this new product, and several other KB and conditioning products that will be available after the New Year. The site is not completed, but there is plenty of information available. You may contact me with any inquiries.
Thanks,
Steve Cotter
steve@fullkontact.com
www.fullkontact.com
http://www.shihan.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
mspkfv: November 25 2005
|
|
Q for Steve Cotter
|
|
Steve is your new DVD set ready for purchase? If not when? If so where?
Kurt
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 25 2005
|
|
My previous email was probably confusing. The new DVD IS available for purchase now. There will be a lot of different distributors, and hopefully you will purchase the DVD through Dragon Door. John will let you know when it is available here.
You may look at www.shihan.com for product information and a bunch of video clips. Currently, there is only 1 online source to purchase the DVD today and that is the Groundfighter.com link at the bottom.
Any questions, please direct them to me here or via email at steve@fullkontact.com
Thanks,
Steve Cotter
http://www.groundfighter.com/products/catid/61.html
|
|
|
|
Question
|
mspkfv: November 25 2005
|
|
Q for Steve Cotter
|
|
Steve is your new DVD set ready for purchase? If not when? If so where?
Kurt
|
|
Answer
|
Steve Cotter: November 25 2005
|
|
Hey Jared,
There are a bunch of clips on the shihan.com website, so you can see what you're getting.
Sorry I'm not ascetically pleasing enough to you, but that's a good thing!
No, couldn't get that one to model--never heard of him. But, if you want a good-looking model, I may have Mike Mahler guest starring in a future 'project', ha-ha.
How's that Montana weather treating you. Keeping you strong I bet!
|
|
|
|
|