|
Question
|
Curt McDonald: June 04 2006
|
|
End of smolov week 2 - very grim, help please pavel
|
|
well the last day of smolov called for 365 for 10 sets of 3 and I was only able to get 2 sets of 3 and 3 singles. my legs were strong enough, my low back was just too tired.
I want to finish the program, I'm thinking about proceeding as normal with week 3 but add a day of rest between day 3 and 4. Your opinions?
My back has been sore for over a week. This is a bitch
Curt
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 05 2006
|
|
Curt,
Did you set your weights for the Smolov off of your raw squat PR or off of your equipment PR?
If you set your weights using your equipment PR but you are doing the smolov raw - then that is why the routine is killing you -
Use your raw PR to establish your #'s for the routine.
Your training is somewhat sporatic - Lots of mentions of shoulder pain and working in and out of gear - IMO - you should focus on the raw lifts (belt only).
BTW - what is your Raw deadlift?
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Curt McDonald: June 04 2006
|
|
End of smolov week 2 - very grim, help please pavel
|
|
well the last day of smolov called for 365 for 10 sets of 3 and I was only able to get 2 sets of 3 and 3 singles. my legs were strong enough, my low back was just too tired.
I want to finish the program, I'm thinking about proceeding as normal with week 3 but add a day of rest between day 3 and 4. Your opinions?
My back has been sore for over a week. This is a bitch
Curt
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 05 2006
|
|
Curt,
What does your total training routine look like (I haven't looked at your log but will) - if you are on a high volume routine like the Smolov you shouldn't be doing much else.
Also - did you build into the volume with the breakin program or were you used to high volume squatting?
Might want someone to look at your form - if you haven't already.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
T. Phillips RKC: June 05 2006
|
|
AAU meet report
|
|
I will keep this short because I can go on forever (maybe I will do that in a separate post for those interested). I will let Mike and Juliet report their results; however, the two of them went absolutely NUTS and am really proud of both of them. Hopefully Mike will post some vids later as well - so here it is:
Tom
SQ = 363 (good) 375 (good) 385.6 (good)
did not go for 400 because the judges were nuts with the depth - most lifters going easily 2-3 inches below parallel and getting reds. 386 felt most solid of the 3 lifts.
Lesson learned here - I needed to do at least 2 more heavy squats in my warm-ups (only went to 315 because of time) because 363 was a shocker to my left leg in particular. The next two lifts felt much easier.
BP = 264.5 (good) 281.5 (reds) 281.5 (reds)
Was worried about my shoulder going in - but got reds on 281.5 on second attempt because I did not wait long enough on my chest - I got reds on the third because the bar rolled back in my hand and bent the wrist back (something that has happened to me before two or three times and don't know what the hell is up with that) I have pressed 290 in the gym very smoothly and was really disappointed with my performance here. Old PR was 280 and was expecting to blow that away with at least 292. This was the only disappointment of my meet.
DL - 474 (good) 507 (good) 512.6 (good)
If I could have done my attempts over again I would have gone right to 518 after the 474 because the 507 and 512 were clean and felt stronger than ever. I did not take the 530 record attempt because the 507 and 512 tapped me pretty good and I would have only had about a 2 minute rest because I was the second to last lifter in the third flight. Instead of risking an injury I declined - I would not have gotten it with such short rest if at all.
The biggest thing I can report here is that the DL is feeling like a different lift thanks to all the glute-ham work. I can sit better in the bottom, I can hold an arch better, and my lockouts are strong as hell. I know Mike and Juliet will report the same. When Mike posts the vids you will see the difference.
Overall really happy with the exception of the bench and going six for six on SQ and DL were huge for me. The BP I am not as worried about because that will come along once the shoulder gets to 100%. Looking forward to the next one already!
Totaled 1163 @ 181 which is an 18# increase in my previous total despite falling apart on the BP. Like I said - I will take it.
Thomas Phillips
www.ThomasPhillipsFitness.com
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 05 2006
|
|
Thomas,
Great meet - hitting PRs and increasing your total are good things ;)
Frustrating not to hit your #'s in the bench but like Scott said - you learned alot and will be stronger in the next one.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
soupdad: June 06 2006
|
|
HOW MUCH STRENGTH GAIN—REALISTICALLY?
|
|
I've heard all the hype about Pavel's Russian strength training methods. And I've started on a program. But I’d like to know how much stronger can I actually/realistically expect to get out of it. What is the limit of % strength gain I can realistically expect & HOW LONG till I see that % of gain?
100%
200%?
Can I expect 300% more strength gain after a year or three?
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 07 2006
|
|
Soupdad,
There is no way to answer the question without knowing what you are doing now? (ie. current routine and strength level at the exercise you would like to improve at etc...)
Then we get into what you are prepared to do to achieve the goal... If you are waiting for some sort of validation - it is a form of procrastination.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
soupdad: June 07 2006
|
|
How much Strength Potential--BJones
|
|
Actually BJ: I was not seeking "validation". I don't know where the hell you got that from.
I'm basically trying to get the FACTS...a realistic view as to what is possible, so that I don't get my hopes up. I set long term goals, but just need to know if its HUMANLY possible to be 300% stronger...and if so, how long COULD it take for any one HUMAN (not specifically me).
Anyway....about ME:
I am 5'8", 145lbs.....I am a Meso-Ecto Morph. I use free weights for benchpress, deadlifts, and sometimes squats...using the 2-5 rep/2-3 sets routine, altho sometimes I feel like doing more sets.
Occasionally I also engage in TaiBo workouts, as well as skip rope.
The days I weightlift varies, only becuz I'm not sure how often to workout.
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 08 2006
|
|
By validation I was referring to your exercise routine - not anything else - so relax a bit.
you still did not provide any information on your current weights for the exercises or details on your training. You say you set some goals - what are they and where are you now?
Is it possible to get 300% stronger - sure as Brad N. pointed out.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Taki: June 08 2006
|
|
Where did you buy your Kettlebell?
|
|
I'm living in Atlanta, and I was wondering if there was a way to buy them locally (shipping is a killer!). Does everyone just order them?
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 08 2006
|
|
Taki,
You refer to gaining weight in your post - if that is your primary goal then a KB might not be your best investment - (nothing better for overall conditioning but....) - your college should have a weight room available to the students - get in there and get instruction on how to squat, bench and deadlift.
Your tools have to match up with your goals - pull-ups and pistols and one arm push-ups are not the best mass builders but great strength basics.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
soupdad: June 08 2006
|
|
My goals--Feasible?
|
|
My goal is to become a Mutant (as Pavel calls it). Meaning, one of the strength elite. Not for showing off, but for my personal use of strength---sports, emergencies, saving lives, fighting crime, etc, WHATEVER.
My current abilities, at 5’8”, and being a Meso-Ecto Morph:
Bench 170lbs (max)
Deadlift 300lbs (max)
Pulldown 90lbs (max)
Curls 20lbs (max)
Squats 190lbs (max)
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 08 2006
|
|
soupdad,
OK- if your goal is to get 300% stronger in all of the above lifts - only time and consistant effort will tell. You may find that you are a "mutant" in some of these areas but not in all of them. Your DL may be a strong point but your bench may not - no way to tell until you put in the time and effort.
Get started on a basic program and lay down a good foundation - Power to the People and Beyond Bodybuilding will answer many of your questions.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
T. Phillips RKC: June 09 2006
|
|
ATTN: Brett Jones
|
|
Brett - sent you mail yesterday - did you get it?
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 09 2006
|
|
Thomas,
I got it just climbing out of the hole I am in from traveling 5 of the last 7 weekends.
Shoot you a reply later today.
BTW- I am competingn in a push/pull meet tomorrow - Should be fun!
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
PRS: June 12 2006
|
|
My weekend with Tim Larkin and Brett Jones
|
|
A few weeks back, I took a 2-day seminar with Tim Larkin at his new training center in San Diego. I highly recommend it. He teaches how to use violence in an anti-social environment, where your life or the life of a loved one is at stake. He takes you through targets on the body that disable and how best to strike them, how to use weapons and how to attack someone with a weapon. The training methodology is the slow motion fight with your partner giving appropriate reactions, which they also teach. I have participated for many years in different martial arts and boxing, and I wish they would have taught this approach as an adjunct. Martial arts and boxing are sport -- fighting games played by rules with the goal of winning the game. Anti-social violence is survival. Very worthwhile to look into.
After the seminar, I trained with Brett Jones. What a privilege. He took the time to ask me a series of detailed questions about injuries, limitations and experience. He then took me through each of the basic lifts, breaking down my form, picking out things I was doing that were causing me problems, using drills to show me how harmful my bad habits were and how to correct them. We spent a good deal of time on the swing, front squat, military press, snatch, windmill and turkish get-up. Each exercise built into the next. We ended with working on grippers. About a year ago, I injured myself (back) after breaking two toes, changing my gait, starting bjj, etc., and have had a hard time getting back to normal. Brett spotted what I was doing that was triggering the weaknesses from the injury, and showed me how to correct them. Our hour session lasted one and a half hours and his business partner, Sara, who was waiting for him for dinner, sounded none too happy when she called to ask where he was. But his sole focus was on working through all the challenges I had raised and that he had spotted. The guy is just a class act.
I bought his DVD's and I recommend them highly. I am a DD consumer and have a library of stuff. His DVD is perfect for starting out in kettlebells or for going back to the basics to make them stronger and to correct all the bad habits that creep in. He breaks down each of the basic exercises movement by movement, points out common errors each step of the way and shows how to fix them. DD should offer his DVD and a kettlebell as a standard intro package for newcomers.
I have been fortunate enough to have taken seminars from Mike Mahler, Steve Maxwell, Steve Cotter and Pavel and I've had the chance to train in my business travels with Catherine Imes and Dylan Thomas. I am constantly amazed at how much there is to learn in how to use this dynamic conditioning, and in the uniform high quality of RKC's.
Pete Silverman
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 12 2006
|
|
Pete,
It was great to work with you. Thank you for the kind words and great feedback - you will make great progress.
Tim's stuff is great and I look forward to getting a look at the new facility.
Keep me posted and let me know if there is anything else I can do for you.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
hermanchauw: June 12 2006
|
|
Can Smolov be used with deadlift?
|
|
My school gym doesn't have a squat rack, so can i deadlift instead of squat?
Thanks.
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 12 2006
|
|
Build your base with PTP and then ease into volume routines using some other routines.
The pre-RSR routine by Eddie K is a good way to ease into the volume (check the articles for details).
IMO - volume can bite you back
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Mercer: June 12 2006
|
|
Good book on powerlifting
|
|
I've been following PTP style cycling in my bench press and deadlift for a significant amount of time. It's getting to the point where to increase my maximum bench press and or deadlift by 5 lbs every two weeks is unrealistic. I want to start training so that I will make these types of increases every month or even two months but I don't know how to go about doing this. I was wondering if someone could recommend a good book on powerlifting or some other type of book that explains, for example, how to keep making gains in the deadlift after exceeding more than twice a person's bodyweight?
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 12 2006
|
|
Mercer,
Not that I am the great answer grape of powerlifting knowledge - rifstonian and Jack Reape are though -
My opinion on the subject:
Stick with the big three + limited assistance exercises until you hit a true peak.
At 2x bodyweight you are just now getting started in the DL - not peaking.
Until you do develop a solid raw base - you don't know where your true weaknesses are -
so
there are many ways to manipulate the intensity, volume etc... and perform similar but different versions of the basics lifts.
Without knowing what you are doing now - it is impossible to give more specific advice but read a lot and try to find an experienced powerlifter in your area or communicate with Mark Rifkeind (rifstonian on the forum), and Jack Reape.
BTW - wave cycles, step cycles etc.. allow for adding weight in a slower fashion - PTP is still a great way to go.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
jpt: June 13 2006
|
|
Back problems with the deadlift
|
|
I've always noticed that my lower back is weakened and is an inch from spraining after dead-lifts. Yesterday, I was doing a low weight dead-lift and something went wrong... finally sprained it. It hurts, but it'll be fine. However, I'd like to know if there's any kind of warm up or stretching I need to do before the deadlift to prevent this in the future. I don't think I've been using bad form, although I'll pay more careful attention to it from now on. I also have relax into a stretch, so anyone would care to point me in the right direction, it'd be great.
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 13 2006
|
|
jpt,
Get your form looked at by an experienced PL coach or competitor - even sending video into someone like rifstonian or Jack Reape would be a good idea.
McKenzie protocol is a good idea but hard to be specific without knowing a lot more.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
rifstonian: June 13 2006
|
|
Powerlifting by percentages
|
|
Talking on the phone with Brett yesterday the topic of how hard it can be to peak for the three powerlifts came up. I told him that one of Louie's earliest training templates is one I found very effective for dialing in the lifts. You are after 101% of your last, current pr.Everything else is gravy. After you get your 101% you use that as your nex max and recycle.
This is obviously a very general blueprint but it ties in volume and intensity very well( prileping table) as well as increasing overall work capacity.
each lift done once per week;
Squat ( use compensatory acceleration on each rep)
wk 1 8x3 70%45-60 sec/sets
2 8x3 75% 60-75 sec /set
3 6x2 80% 75-90 sec /sets
4 4x2 85% 2 minutes/sets
5 70%x2 75%x2 80%x2 85%x2 90%x2 3-4 minutes/sets
6 deload 70%4x2 one minute/sets
7 COntest, gym test or recycle with 5 lbs more each %
assistance exercises for lower back and abs/swing would work great here.
bench
same structure as squat but I would use a variety of different grips each set;alternating close, medium and comp.assiance work is heavy on triceps extensions and lat and upper back development work.
deadlift( comp acceleration here too)
wk1 70% 12x1 30 sec
2 75% 8x1 45 sec
3 80% 6x1 60 sec
4 85% 4x1
5 70%x1 75%x1 80%x1 85%x1 90%x1
6 deload, no deadlifts
7 contest, gym test or recycle.
assistance exercises for legs lower back abs. swings, santches and cleans here would plug in great.reverse hyper and sled dragging is also nice.
another day can be added for more triceps lats and delts as well as other light hypertrophy work as active recovery.
THis template served me and many otherss well for many years and was the basis for Louies next level of box squat/speed training. In retrospect though, this simple program garned the best results. gave the best form and produced the least injuries of all the other permutations of WSB.
Its brought my training partner from never having squatted 4 years ago to a pr 562 last meet last month and now thoughts of 601 at Nationals July 9.Drug free too.
let me know if you have questions. good luck.
Rif
http://GiryaStrength.com
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 13 2006
|
|
Love it Rif - what strikes me right away is the relative low volume of the routine - higher intesities certainly but lower volume (without the assistance work).
I'm going to hit my little plan for a few weeks and then use this as a peaking routine leading into one of the AAU meets.
Thank you for posting this - just one of the reasons I am glad you on the forum.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Randy Hauer RKC: June 14 2006
|
|
Komrade Kinesiologists: please check me on Lombard's Paradox
|
|
Doing some research for an article...example of Lombard's paradox: when squatting (or recovering from a squat) both hamstrings and rectus femoris contract simultaneously. The paradox: How can a flexor participate in extension and vice versa? How can a contracting muscle "push" a joint? Classic explanation for this has been moment arm lengths as they relate to relative position of attachments.
Would the modern explanation be more along the lines of synergistic/stabilizing actions? Example of what I mean: When standing up from a squat the primary action is hip extension (glutes and hams do both hip extension + knee flexion) however, if rectus femoris (hip flexor + knee extension) wasn't involved, the torso would be pulled over backwards by the hip extensors. Similarly at the completion of the recovery, the hip extensors assist rectus femoris (and the vasti) in stabilizing the knee joint in the lock out position...if the extensors weren't involved, rectus femoris' continued action would flex the hip and the torso would topple forwards.
Another example...the muscles that extend the thumb also abduct the wrist. Without the ulnar side muscles stabilizing (adducting)the wrist joint, any effort to extend the thumb would only result in wrist abduction.
Oversimplified, I know. And no math. But on the right track?
Thanks,
Randy
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 14 2006
|
|
Randy,
If I am correct in remembering Lombard's paradox (and I may not be)
it is based on dead anatomy - looking only at what one muscle or groups action would be in the concentric phase.
Life and living anatomy is different and takes into account - concentric, eccentric, stabilizing and synergistic actions of the muscles and related patterns of muscular firing.
Just as taught at the RKC - the hip flexors play a critical role in the descent of the squat - this loads the hip extensors better and "braces" the body.
The coordination of knee extensors and hip extensors is essential for knee stability - agonist/antagonist synergistic action.
Small rant: (not towards you Randy)
This is the problem with how anatomy is taught - in isolation as a dead anatomy - as living beings the realities are very different. Intrafusel muscle fibers, joint mechanoreceptors, golgi tendon organs, visual, vetibular, proprioception and many other factors come into play -
So the problem with Lombard's paradox is that it is based in dead anatomy.
Physics can prove that a bumblebee cannot fly - Anatomy can prove similar inaccurate things.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Randy Hauer RKC: June 14 2006
|
|
Komrade Kinesiologists: please check me on Lombard's Paradox
|
|
Doing some research for an article...example of Lombard's paradox: when squatting (or recovering from a squat) both hamstrings and rectus femoris contract simultaneously. The paradox: How can a flexor participate in extension and vice versa? How can a contracting muscle "push" a joint? Classic explanation for this has been moment arm lengths as they relate to relative position of attachments.
Would the modern explanation be more along the lines of synergistic/stabilizing actions? Example of what I mean: When standing up from a squat the primary action is hip extension (glutes and hams do both hip extension + knee flexion) however, if rectus femoris (hip flexor + knee extension) wasn't involved, the torso would be pulled over backwards by the hip extensors. Similarly at the completion of the recovery, the hip extensors assist rectus femoris (and the vasti) in stabilizing the knee joint in the lock out position...if the extensors weren't involved, rectus femoris' continued action would flex the hip and the torso would topple forwards.
Another example...the muscles that extend the thumb also abduct the wrist. Without the ulnar side muscles stabilizing (adducting)the wrist joint, any effort to extend the thumb would only result in wrist abduction.
Oversimplified, I know. And no math. But on the right track?
Thanks,
Randy
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 14 2006
|
|
Randy,
found this with a quick google search - Lombard's paradox comes from 1907 - dead anatomy to be sure.
You might ping Dr. McGill with a question on this - he would certainly have an answer.
Or maybe bumblebees cannot fly??!! ;)
Brett
http://moon.ouhsc.edu/dthompso/namics/lombard.htm
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Randy Hauer RKC: June 14 2006
|
|
Komrade Kinesiologists: please check me on Lombard's Paradox
|
|
Doing some research for an article...example of Lombard's paradox: when squatting (or recovering from a squat) both hamstrings and rectus femoris contract simultaneously. The paradox: How can a flexor participate in extension and vice versa? How can a contracting muscle "push" a joint? Classic explanation for this has been moment arm lengths as they relate to relative position of attachments.
Would the modern explanation be more along the lines of synergistic/stabilizing actions? Example of what I mean: When standing up from a squat the primary action is hip extension (glutes and hams do both hip extension + knee flexion) however, if rectus femoris (hip flexor + knee extension) wasn't involved, the torso would be pulled over backwards by the hip extensors. Similarly at the completion of the recovery, the hip extensors assist rectus femoris (and the vasti) in stabilizing the knee joint in the lock out position...if the extensors weren't involved, rectus femoris' continued action would flex the hip and the torso would topple forwards.
Another example...the muscles that extend the thumb also abduct the wrist. Without the ulnar side muscles stabilizing (adducting)the wrist joint, any effort to extend the thumb would only result in wrist abduction.
Oversimplified, I know. And no math. But on the right track?
Thanks,
Randy
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 14 2006
|
|
Randy,
I like that one - we all need to know our anatomy (where which "thing" is) but understand that the nervous system is king and once things are in motion - everything changes.
The concept of training movements not muscles is the key. Rehab is the place for "isolation" and even then only for a limited time.
Good food for thought
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Trent Uni Rower: June 14 2006
|
|
PTP Tempo???
|
|
In the (Power to the People) workout, it says exectue the lifts slowly to maximise tension.
What sort of tempo should you be aiming for?
Chris
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 14 2006
|
|
Trent,
You should learn to maximize muscular tension
- hence the "treat your light weights heavy - so your heavy weights feel light"
- once the weight is heavy enough - even though the intention is to lift the weight as "quickly" as possible it will move "slowly" to the outside observer.
On the deadlift - the concentric phase may take 3-5 seconds but the eccentric should be a controlled but quicker descent - trying to lower slowly places most people in a position to get injured if the weight pulls them forward- so a quick but controlled lower is best.
On the side press - it might take the same time on both phases if you are truly "pulling" the weight down.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
cdc: June 14 2006
|
|
Deadlifts and back pain
|
|
I've done squats with the universal machine for years. Built up to 540lbs. My new gym had the hack squat machine and was doing 340.
After reading Pavel's book on deadlifts 3 years ago, I bought a 300 lb weight set. Tried with 115# and my back hurt. Took a year off, did another year of pilates and tried again. My back still hurts.
Pavel doesn't show the bottom position in his book so I don't know if I'm doing it right. I can easily palm the floor and can almost get my legs behind my head so flexibility is no problem.
My back book shows to tuck under the pelvis at the bottom. My question is how much do I tuck under? My back doctor said to stop doing them and also squats but I really love the exercise and don't have to go to the gym to do them either.
I've been hitting the ab bench and have progressed to 1 leg straight suspended okay with perfect technique. I decompress the spine after deads but this doesn't relieve the problem.
Maybe even with perfect technique deads aren't for me since I am tall and lean. Should I just stick to pistols instead?
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 14 2006
|
|
The pelvis does NOT, NOT - tuck under at the bottom position of the DL or Squat - you need to get to a PL coach and learn the proper form- the back is arched at the bottom - try the face the wall squat to learn the position.
Your technique needs to be worked on.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
powerlifter54: June 14 2006
|
|
13 not an unlucky number for me
|
|
On the road yesterday so had to work out in a strange gym, but it was a good one. In middle of a big ramp up after a slighly unplanned backoff week, but was able to lay a bunch of training on before i took a week off for the most part.
Check out my June Training log for a real life example of delayed training effect and back off weeks. I also did a bunch of band work in the sq and BP th elast week of may. So the band cycle was 2 weeks, and it was hard on my pecs but my squat went wild yesterday after the week off. Scheduled to go up to 495x3 but sometimes you know it is there so you go a bit more:
raw squat 225x3x2, 315x3, 405x3, 495x3, 545x3 20lb PR. Was planning on 545 next week but got it in, so next week will go easier in squat and push DL to a big triple off plates or with TKO bar.
Interestingly i did two 405x3x2 GTG workouts on either side of my 5 day vacation.
You only have to PR once a month to make huge progress, if you hit one almost every month.
Cycling, GTG, and back offs work!
jmo
jack
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 14 2006
|
|
Jack,
I have had the similar effect from somewhat unplanned back offs from training and have come back stronger every time.
If things go right I'll be seeing you in VA for the AAU meet - should be my first three lift meet.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
yfnwman: June 14 2006
|
|
PTP Cycling/Ladder Hybrid Problems
|
|
I started doing the PTP Cycling/Ladder Hybrid Bench program a few weeks ago. I liked it at first. Even on the first cycle of teh routine I did a set of 5 reps with a weight I don't think I had ever been able to do before. So anyway, I finished the cycle off with a set of 200lbs. I barely, I mean BARELY got it 5x. Its one of those sets where the last rep seems like it takes an eternity to go up. But anyway, I got it all up and I was proud of myself. The next say I tried 205 and only got 3 reps but that was ok. I decided to take two days off and start the ladder phase with sets of 1-2-3. Much to my dismay and confusion when I started back I was weaker! I could barely get past the set of 2 reps before failing! I hadn't eaten as much as I should have in the few days surrounding it so I figured that was it. Since then I made sure to eat enough and took off 10lbs and tried sets of 190. Even with that weight I still have trouble. I could barely do four ladder sets of 1-2-3. Whats the deal? Is this normal? Did I do something wrong? I feel like I'm backtracking and losing ground.
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 15 2006
|
|
You need to take a back off week - low volume - low intensity and recover.
Then re-set your ladders at about 10 or so pounds higher than where you started the last time - or switch it up and go to 3-5 sets of 3-5 reps for a couple of weeks.
When you peak - such as a very difficult or max set of 5 - it is time to cycle back in combination with a back off week.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
yfnwman: June 14 2006
|
|
PTP Cycling/Ladder Hybrid Problems
|
|
I started doing the PTP Cycling/Ladder Hybrid Bench program a few weeks ago. I liked it at first. Even on the first cycle of teh routine I did a set of 5 reps with a weight I don't think I had ever been able to do before. So anyway, I finished the cycle off with a set of 200lbs. I barely, I mean BARELY got it 5x. Its one of those sets where the last rep seems like it takes an eternity to go up. But anyway, I got it all up and I was proud of myself. The next say I tried 205 and only got 3 reps but that was ok. I decided to take two days off and start the ladder phase with sets of 1-2-3. Much to my dismay and confusion when I started back I was weaker! I could barely get past the set of 2 reps before failing! I hadn't eaten as much as I should have in the few days surrounding it so I figured that was it. Since then I made sure to eat enough and took off 10lbs and tried sets of 190. Even with that weight I still have trouble. I could barely do four ladder sets of 1-2-3. Whats the deal? Is this normal? Did I do something wrong? I feel like I'm backtracking and losing ground.
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 15 2006
|
|
You hit a peak - meaning your training led to a increase in strength - once you peak you need to cycle back and start again.
If you keep trying to push the peak further you will end up overtrained and go backwards.
Peak - back off - re-start
Get Power to the People and ready Jack Reape's posts about back off weeks and cycling trianing
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
alabamaalex: June 15 2006
|
|
Dragondoor,3+ pood kettlebell?
|
|
Any plans on making bigger kettlebells than the beast?
More and more people are taming it everyday.
J/C
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 15 2006
|
|
Not only does being able to do some singles with the beast or snatching it for multiple reps not equal mastering it -
The weight and size of the KB becomes unmanagable and out of balance at a certain point - I was actually surprised that the beast kept it's balance as well as it does.
BTW - The russian military and others do not go beyond the 24kg KB because they feel there is a point of dimenishing returns with the increasing weights.
GS competition and circus performers go beyond the 24kg. Interesting line of thought...
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Shawn M: June 15 2006
|
|
Question for Brett Jones or Zach S.................
|
|
Thanks!
Directing this question at you guys since as knowledgeable PTs you would know!
Today someone demonstrated the "corkscrew" technique for lowering the KB. He suggested that it would be an ideal way to lower the 48 after a hardstyle upswing to save the grip and get a few more reps. I have never tried this and if this is the way to go to hit more heavy reps I will learn it, but I just want to know if this is a good idea and sound for use on the heavier bells.
Thanks!!
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 16 2006
|
|
The 48kg is a bit much to start throwing rotational forces into the equation. A straight drop from the top will challlenge the grip but hey it is 106 pounds on a thick handle dropping from about 7 feet!
The corkscrew works well in situations where you can "relax" during the movement - not somthing I am doing when snatching the 48kg.
Lowering to the shoulder is certainly a good option but dropping from the top will develop the grip more and load you for the next rep.
Keep us posted
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Taking Cattle: June 16 2006
|
|
what if I did the Bear with insanely heavy partials for the first two sets?
|
|
then did the mass-building sets with full range reps?
I want to give Power Factor Training another shot. Since I did it the first time I know more about working out and think I know how to milk it properly.
The other choice I'm thinking of is do the PFT workouts as prescribed and do some swings, snatches, cleans, presses, pistols, push-ups and pull-ups every morning. Nothing strenuous, just a solid 20-30 minutes of activity using the muscles' full ROMs.
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 16 2006
|
|
Z,
The difference between the exercise and the bodies available ROM is what I was looking for and I agree- in my mind the DL is just an exercise - "proper" execution of the lift is just what it is.
Nail bending is an interesting hobby! I have backed way off on this and am focused on powerlifting.
Thanks
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
JT_76: June 17 2006
|
|
Question on getting into starting position for DL
|
|
I like how Pavel did deads in PTP, generating full body tension and pulling himself down to the bar and getting his grip without looking at the bar. On the other hand, seems most powerlifters bend down relaxed looking at the bar, adjust their hands and feet and then tense up, sit down into it and look up and drive.
Pavels way feels the strongest for me, the only problem I have with it is I can't ever get my hands evenly spaced. It's not a drastic difference but invaribly one is out farther and I can feel it as I'm coming up. I've done them the other way and it's not bad until the weights get near max and then I feel like my back is rounding because I didn't generate enough tension in the set up.
Just splitting hairs I guess, anyone have some tips for a cleaner start on the dead?
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 18 2006
|
|
If I remember correctly the symetrical reference may have been related to the suitcase DL not the standard DL.
You should try to have an even grip on the bar.
I do not look at the bar either when I set up - and I know when I am off center.
Brett
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Ben: June 25 2006
|
|
where does the name kettlebell come from?
|
|
Where does the term kettlebell come from? This question is prompted because of a discussion I had with a Russian student a little while ago. He had not heard of a "kettlebell" before but he knew all the "girya".
Thanks for the info!
Ben
|
|
Answer
|
BJones RKC: June 26 2006
|
|
Relax -
the Kettlebells and techniques taught and promoted by Dragondoor most certainly come from Russia -
exact origins etc... doesn't matter.
BTW - the term dumb-bell goes back to ancient greece where athletes started using broken musical insturments (bells) filled with water (dumb since it will not make sound).
Brett
|
|
|