|
Question
|
fusionman: March 01 2005
|
|
Useful alternative to GTG???
|
|
Hey everyone, I have been doing gtg with weighted pull ups for a little over a month. I don't seem to be any stronger; I came down on the weight for gtg and now doing what I used to be capable of is really hard. I do not feel fresh anymore and I think this is the main contributing factor. Is there any practice out there besides gtg that will help develop neuro muscular strength, not strength through hypertrophy?
p.s. I already know of ladders...
Thanks for any input.
-Nick
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 01 2005
|
|
With GTG it is easy to become overzealous and do too much which is counterproductive. Try going another GTG cycle asn start with 50% of your one set max on a slightly different exercise such as rope or towel pull-ups.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Ethan Reeve: March 01 2005
|
|
Mike Mahler's Aggressive Strength DVD
|
|
Folks,
We have watched Mike's new DVD "Mahler's Aggressive Strength Kettlebell Solution for Size and Strength". My two assistant coaches Mike Tolloti and David Bass have also watched Mike's new DVD. And we all agree that Mike has done an excellent job with this. It is very informative and easy to understand. The production and title work is excellent. Mike's setting and all demonstrations is on the beach in California. Mike takes you through all of his basic and assistant exercises one at a time. You can go back to any lift on this DVD for future use and information. His demonstrations are super. Mike speaks very well, is easy to understand and gives the listener great tips to be successful on each lift. We thoroughly enjoyed this DVD and highly recommend it to all folks interested in learning the technique of kettlebells, especially with two at at a time, and for those folks that want to get big and truly strong using kettlebells!
In Strength,
Ethan Reeve
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 01 2005
|
|
I cannot tell you how much your feedback means to me. I have been a big fan of your work for many years and the fact that you think so highly of my DVD is very flattering to say the least. Thanks a lot and I look forward to visiting wake forst in the near future.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Rikard: March 01 2005
|
|
5x5x5?
|
|
Deadlifts
Benchpress/sidepress(wich one is better?)
Squats/Lunges
Pullups/Dips(only have ankleweights and doesn't afford a belt)
+2 ab exercises 3 times a week and tabata-sprints on the other 2
(and like 1 onehandpushup and planche before bed)
Does this sound like a good idea?
Need help rotating them if so.
Btw, is there any way to look like a bodybuilder but be as strong as a powerlifter?
//rikard
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 02 2005
|
|
And the way that people look at the bench press now is the way that ovehead presses used to be looked at. The standing Mil press works your shoulders, chest tricpes, lower back, and lats.
But the side press and bench press are also of course great exercises. Just pick one and rotate it with the others every 4 weeks. No stop asking questions and get started! ;-)
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Rikard: March 01 2005
|
|
5x5x5?
|
|
Deadlifts
Benchpress/sidepress(wich one is better?)
Squats/Lunges
Pullups/Dips(only have ankleweights and doesn't afford a belt)
+2 ab exercises 3 times a week and tabata-sprints on the other 2
(and like 1 onehandpushup and planche before bed)
Does this sound like a good idea?
Need help rotating them if so.
Btw, is there any way to look like a bodybuilder but be as strong as a powerlifter?
//rikard
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 01 2005
|
|
I would start with the smaller muscle groups first such as presses and pull-ups and do the deadlifts or squats int he middle and wrap up with the core work. Sure, I would change to similar exercises every 4 weeks or just change the rep scheme such as 5x3x5 (five sets of three, five times a week)
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Rikard: March 01 2005
|
|
5x5x5?
|
|
Deadlifts
Benchpress/sidepress(wich one is better?)
Squats/Lunges
Pullups/Dips(only have ankleweights and doesn't afford a belt)
+2 ab exercises 3 times a week and tabata-sprints on the other 2
(and like 1 onehandpushup and planche before bed)
Does this sound like a good idea?
Need help rotating them if so.
Btw, is there any way to look like a bodybuilder but be as strong as a powerlifter?
//rikard
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 01 2005
|
|
Doing heavy squats first will make many people fatigued for the rest of the workout. If it works for you, stick with it. However, for many people doing deadlifts or squats first is a great way to ruin the rest of the workout. Just my opinion.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
BHODAZAFA: March 01 2005
|
|
mike mahler - sand bags
|
|
hey mike- i recall a post some time ago regarding sand bags - wondering if you purchased the K 2 sand bag, and if you do have it, can you tell a little about it
- how does it compare to other sand bags you have used
- how is the "grip handles" on the side of the bag
- what did you fill your bag with, sand, or chains or something else
- has it withstood your punishment - do you drop it, throw it, etc? (any wear & tear signs on the bag yet?)
thanks in advance Mike :)
if anyone else has the K 2 bag please post any comment, looking forward to hearing some feedback
all the best my friends,
zach even - esh
www.GridironGladiator.com
Combat Grappler
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 01 2005
|
|
First, let me be state that K2 fitness was nice enough to send me a complimentary sandbag to review. Thus, I did not pay for it and wanted you to know that in advance before I answer your questions. However, don't think that I am giving them a positive review just because they sent me a free sandbag. I get free products all of the time and endorse very few of them. That said, please read my answers below:
- how does it compare to other sand bags you have used? Superior! The double layered canvas bags are easier to grab onto for trianing and there is no chance of leaking. Nothing like a sand shower to ruin your day. Just ask Steve Maxwell ;-)
- how is the "grip handles" on the side of the bag? Very cool, and makes doing exercises easier which is great for beginners. As you get advanced, you can avoid the handles to make the work harder.
- what did you fill your bag with, sand, or chains or something else? I just use sand(after all it is free on any beach in LA ;-), but you could use rice or wood chips.
- has it withstood your punishment - do you drop it, throw it, etc? (any wear & tear signs on the bag yet?) I have only used it a few times, but plan on doing a sandbag only workout for a month at some point this year. My guess is that it would withstand lots of punishment. However, at this point I cannot say that from experience.
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
Question
|
dupe26: March 02 2005
|
|
Mike Mahler - Kudos!
|
|
Excellent DVD, very comprehensive and informative. You showed how to do each excercise properly from different angles, gave great tips citing other knowledgeable sources, and showed proper breathing for performing the exercise.
Questions:
1 - What do you think of doing Kettlebell Bench Presses (incline or flat) as opposed to the Kettlebell Floor Press? I know that you mentioned that the floor press incorporated more of the triceps since elbows were closer to the sides.
2 - The DVD mentioned that a training program accompanied the DVD. I don't recall receiving one. I that available online?
Again, thanks and congrats! You inspired me to order another full set so I can do double kettlebell exercises.
Cheers!
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 02 2005
|
|
One, thanks a lot and glad that you liked the DVD.
Next, sure the Kb bench press is a good exercise. Try it with one kettlebell the way Ethan Reeve has his athletes do it. The free hand is resting in your stomach while you press the bell with the working hand.
The DVD User guide is a PDF file that is sent to you. Email me at mahler25@yahoo.com and I will get one out to you.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Josef: March 02 2005
|
|
An accidental miltary press PR?
|
|
I was teaching at my college's gym yesterday and was going to demonstrate the decompression hang and, lacking anything else to hang on, chose a power rack. But the only one that wasn't in use had a 135 lb. barbell on it. Being lazy and not wanting to unload it, I just pressed it off the pins it was on (about level to my mouth) and placed on the top pins(at the top of my reach) and it wasn't very hard. I'm 145 lb. and 5'6 (in case the power rack seemed huge) so this was a shocker to the people I was teaching. I think that helped my credibility for when I teach strength training.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 02 2005
|
|
I am always stronger at my seminars or teaching at the RKC certs than at my own workouts (unless an attractive woman walks by ;-) I guess the fear of looking like an idiot in front of people or the desire to impress adds some juice to the engine! Great work
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
jonmcclain: March 02 2005
|
|
Help: Clean and Press Specialization?
|
|
After being stuck at a disappointing plateau for a while, I was hoping any of you could give some advice on how to build up the clean and strict press. At a bodyweight of 190, I am currently stuck at 165 lbs press,can do 10 HSPU's from the ground against the wall and hold one-arm HS's against a wall. Cleaning isnt the problem; I have in the past cleaned and push-pressed 215. I could have cleaned more than that, but I could not get it overhead. My goal is simply strength, I'm also an avid climber and do not really want to gain weight, as you can see I'm heavy enough. One course of action I thought of would be applying the smolov cycle to overhead pressing, would that be overkill? Anyways, any advice would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 02 2005
|
|
1. Don't hold the bar too long after you clean it. In other words, clean the bar to your shoulders, get tight and press immediately.
2. Look up slighty at the bar as you press it up. Read this in Pavel's BB book and it worked well for KB presses.
3. Try changing your program (most likely the problem) Try doing 10x1 on Monday and then have a moderate day (70% of Day 1) and do 3x3.
4. Get some TNT cables or Ironwoody bands and work on forced acceleration. the ironwoody bands or jump stretch bands can be attached to the barbell. This tip alone will work really well, do it!
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
proco5150: March 02 2005
|
|
Mahler and others-5x5 vs. 4x6
|
|
I was reading the new hard style and want to give a 4 week run of mike mahler's 5x5 double kb routine for size and strength. My thought is that i've done 5x5 barbell work before and many on this forum have recommended waterbury's 4x6 method in the past instead of the old school 5x5. Anyone have any thoughts about utilizing 4x6 set/rep scheme instead of 5x5?
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 02 2005
|
|
However, I would do 5x4 first and then graduate to 4x6. 4x6 will be harder for most, so once you can do 5x5, you will be ready to move up to 4x6 and then 6x103 with heavier bells. Thanks for reading the article
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
hu tei: March 02 2005
|
|
snatch vs. swing
|
|
what muscles do the snatch work, that the swing doesn't? They dont seem much different to me. I'm new at the iron game, and appreciate any info. thanks.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 02 2005
|
|
It takes more hamstring power and rapid hip drive to get the bell overhead then to head level on a swing (assuming that you are not swinging the bell overhead). Also, the shoulder come into play more on snatches at the end to catch the bell. Finally, there is a shock absorption benefit on snatches that you do not get on swings. Bottom line: Both are great drills that you should do. Just depends on what you are training for. For cardio, swings cannot be beat as they are not as techically demanding. In other words, when you get tired, you will not bang up your wrists or miss lockouts.
Also, I prefer to teach swings to athletes over snatches as the learning curve is much shorter.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
rifstonian: March 05 2005
|
|
Tempering
|
|
whats the difference between the bucket method and a cold shower? I am interested in trying this but it sure would be more convienent just switching on the cold faucet.
rif
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 05 2005
|
|
Mark,
I have used both methods and I can tell you that you never get used to dumping a cold bucket of watet over your head. Especially, when the weather is cold. However, the bucket method really wakes you up in a brutal way. With a cold shower it does not hit you as hard and it is easy to turn the water up or get out of the way of the shower. With the bucket once you pour it over your head, there is no escape!
One thing that I picked up recently from Louie simmons, is to ice the shoulders and chest down while sitting in a hot tub. I use two cyrocups and have a hot tub at my apartment complex. Ice the shoulders and chest for a minute or two, then get the upper body under water for a minute or two and then ice again etc. tried it yesterday and liked it.
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
mikey: March 08 2005
|
|
Mike Mahler: joint mobility in your recent newsletter...
|
|
Hey Mike. Ive always been a fan of your newsletters. In your latest one you talk about doing doing joint mobility after your workouits and on your rest days.
I was wondering what does your routine look like. Is it simple join rotations like in the first part of superjoints. Or do you follow a Maxwell style joint mobility workout/fureys royal court movements.
I never see you mention any sort of stretching in your routines. Do you do any active stretches (2nd part of superjoints), isometric, or static stretching or is all your flexibilty requirements covered by bridging, TGU, squating etc
thanks
Mikey
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 08 2005
|
|
My joint mobility work is a combination of Pavel's and Steve Maxwell's work. One example is:
Egyptian 15 reps l,r
Hula hoop 15 reps in each direction
Cossack 15 reps in each direction
Hindu Pushups 30 reps
Circular sit-ups (from Pavel's Martial Power series) 15 reps to each sife
I also throw in some of John DuCane Qiging work as well. I do isometric stretches as well similar to the program that Coach Davies has in his football book.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
dupe26: March 08 2005
|
|
Is Bear just for guys who want to get bigger? longish
|
|
I have been doing 5X5 for some time now. I lift at home by myself without a spotter so I try not to go "too heavy" so I am never stuck under a large amount of weight.
I am a pretty big guy to begin with (6ft 1 and 240), so I am really just concerned with getting stronger, turning more fat into muscle, and improving athletic performance (rugby).
I also want to feel like I really worked out so I am thinking of doing the Bear (100% X 5, 90% X 5, and then 80% X 5 until my form begins to fail.)
I will periodically re-evaluate my 10 rep max. I will focus on 1 major lift per day.
Monday - Power Cleans
Tuesday - Bench Press
Wednesday - Squat
Thursday - Push Press
Friday - Deadlift
Any thoughts on whether this is the right or wrong way to go?
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 08 2005
|
|
Instead of doing one major lift per day, pick 2 major lifts and do them bear style three times a week. Example: Deadlift and Military press or Squat and bench press. If you do not want to get that much bigger, oick the Mil press and deadlift and focus on those two lifts. Instead of doing sets of five, do sets of 2-3. that way you will be focused on strength rather than strength and size.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Preston: March 08 2005
|
|
Question for John Du Cane, Pavel or Mike Mahler on "elastic winding"
|
|
At http://www.dragondoor.com/cgi-bin/articles.pl?rm=mode3&articleid=156
John's article entitled "Six Powerful (Qigong) Secrets for Generating Greater Strength" includes a section on "elastic winding." Pavel wrote an article (which I haven't read) about elastic winding in a past issue of MILO:
“Muscular force is generated by actin and myosin filaments overlapping each other and forming cross-bridges…once the actin and myosin filaments have maximally overlapped, more tension can be realized by spiralling of the myosin filaments. A change in the length of the pitch of the actin helix may also boost force production during a very intense muscular contraction. Both processes can be compared to twisting a rubber band after it has fully contracted…it enables the muscle to store high amounts of elastic energy as the descending weight stretches the bands and the twists in the bands on the way down.”
I use resistance cables from Lifeline-USA so I wonder how I can use rubber bands to "load, coiled tension" and to use this tension as a preparation or transition for explosive action. (Mike, you use and recommend cable products from Lifeline-USA so I'd guess you'd be a good person to ask about this too.)
I get an image of stretching out a twisted cable. Any point in doing that? Any examples of rubber band exercises that involve "elastic winding"?
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 08 2005
|
|
Louie explains that one of the reasons why band training works is that it caues the concentric phase to be stronger. The concntric phase is stronger because bands teach you how to apply more force and how to be more explosive. The forced accleration that you learn from band training will make you more explosive.
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Musuko: March 09 2005
|
|
Pull ups everyday can it work?????
|
|
Ok I have know this guy who can do 45 pull ups straight off, Infact he so good at doing pull ups he can jump from and overhand grip to a underhand and vicer versa and keep groing (kinda like plyometric pull ups lol.)
When I asked him how he acheived this he claims its from just doing pull ups (45) and press ups (170) every day. He dosent do weights at all just the pull ups and press ups.
I mean is this possible?? When I have tried my press ups get better over about 2 weeks and suddenly I start to lose it my reps start to decline.
As for pull ups Most ive done is 26 reps I acheived this by training pull ups with a weight attached to a belt doing 2x5-8 reps 3 times a week completley different from what my freind has done and after doing 26 reps I was unable to preform the same feat the day after.
Is he just a genetic freak? or is there something in this that im missing?
-Musuko
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 09 2005
|
|
The problem that many trainees make is doing too much everyday. When you train daily you have make each training session a practice rather than a full blown workout. If you max is 26 pull-ups, try starting with 10 5x a day. Leave an hour between each set. After a week go up to 11, then 12 etc. When you get to 16, take two days off and test your max. Chances are good that it has gone up and then start with 50% and do another cycle.
You really have to resist the urge to do more work as most of the sets will feel like a joke and you will find it hard to believe that it is working.
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
determined66: March 09 2005
|
|
Is Mike Mahler a Metro-sexual?
|
|
I re-watched Mike Mahlers Kettlebell solution for size and strength yesterday and made some observations. First Mike's workout clothes match. Second he has a perfect tan. Third he has great skin. Fourth he's ripped. If this isn't metro-sexual material I don't know what is... just joking Mike. I better stop there before you lay the smack down on me with your perfectly manucured fists. Seriously though Mikes physique is definetely a testimate to the quality of his training and his training philosophy.
By the way my sister was watching the video too and said that you are "hot" (just thought I'd boost your ego).
Take home message: Guys if you want to become "hot" and to have women falling all over you then buy Mike's DVD.
Craig Vogel
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 09 2005
|
|
While I have been influenced by LA since living here for many years, I am happy to say that I do not get manicures, facials, or have a closet full of face and body creams. Although I have heard that Brett jones does (just kidding Brett ;-) It is a real asset as you stick out immediately as a result.
Glad that you liked the DVD and tell your sister thanks. I will have to quote you on the last line ;-)
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
krazyrussianguy: March 09 2005
|
|
Kettlebells for teens
|
|
I'm 17 and I am very serious about strength training. I was wondering if kettlebells are a good option for someone my age.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 10 2005
|
|
I have had many teenagers attend my workshops. I had one sixteen year old young lady a few years back who was very impessive. She could knock off one legged squats with ease, pressed the 35lb kettlebell and snatched it for reps.
At my most recent workshop in Marina Del Rey, I had a twelve year old young man knock off reps with ease with 2 35lb bells on the rengegade row. He only weighted 85lbs himself! I agree with Dylan, kettlebells are a great way to introduce young people to weight training.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Rooster: March 09 2005
|
|
Kettlebell workout and Warrior Diet......
|
|
A little concerned about this. I've heard a lot of good things about the warrior diet, but I don't think I can do it while working out with KBs. I've tried it for the last couple of days. Yesterday, I wasn't able to workout. Today, while doing KB swings I started losing my balance and totally lost all my energy. I had planned on doing a 45 minute workout; I was able to do maybe 10-15 minutes. I usually feel zapped with energy...not when I'm starving all day though. I don't really eat much during the day usually. But I think breakfast is very important for me.
I don't guess my body wants to do this right now. I know I ate enough at night so that shouldn't be the problem.
Any comments or suggestion?
Bruce
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 09 2005
|
|
for fat loss. As others have stated, it takes a while to get used to. I actually really liked the freedom of the WD and it did make me feel energetic during the day. I adapted to working out on an empty stomach (no food during the day, workout, and then feast) but that will not work well for everyone. For size and strength, the WD is not the ideal way to go. Just too hard to get all of the calories that you need. for fat loss, it is great.
I think a modified WD will work better for most athletes. Simple food during the day that does not require a lot of energy to digest. (brunch, late afternoon) such as salads, almonds, protein shakes etc and then have your main meal after your workout in the evening.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
trebor: March 09 2005
|
|
any exercise during back off days?
|
|
i feel that ive been over training and am going to have a few back off days and really improve the layout for my workouts. i was wondering tho, if it would be alright to still do some cardio during the backoff days? i was thinking maybe running or sprints or punching bag work or maybe burpees or jumping rope or cycling. would i still be over training if i did some of that stuff, of course i wouldnt do a whole lot but i hate hate hate off days and wanted to do something to keep my metabolism up. any advice would be very appreciated. thanks in advance.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 09 2005
|
|
Many trainees make the mistake of being stimulus freaks. This means that they are more addicted to the stimulus of training, than making training progress. I have been there and believe me it is a lame place to be. Nothing like doing more work and getting less in return.
Get over the need to train all of the time. You need rest days in which you do no training for both your mind and body. Training too much and too often will just release a lot of cortisol (stress hormone) and then you can say goodybe to getting stronger or losing fat. Train in order to make progress not for the stimulus.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
trebor: March 09 2005
|
|
any exercise during back off days?
|
|
i feel that ive been over training and am going to have a few back off days and really improve the layout for my workouts. i was wondering tho, if it would be alright to still do some cardio during the backoff days? i was thinking maybe running or sprints or punching bag work or maybe burpees or jumping rope or cycling. would i still be over training if i did some of that stuff, of course i wouldnt do a whole lot but i hate hate hate off days and wanted to do something to keep my metabolism up. any advice would be very appreciated. thanks in advance.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 10 2005
|
|
Some people get focused on tasks instead of results and feel that they have not worked unless they put in 8 hours. Even if it means 8 hours of unproductive work. Others, focus on achieving goals, get it done faster and move on. You can get away with being task oriented when you work for others. However, if you work for yourself you will be out of business in no time. You get paid for results not putting in time.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Mercer: March 10 2005
|
|
Overtraining concern "long"
|
|
Because I'm not in school for this winter, I have been training very hard since the beginning of the year. I practice strength exercises exclusively which include pistols, pullups, janda situps, an adjustable gripping exercise of my own design, bench presses and deadlifts. I've been doing these exercises in a certain sequence and for a while it seemed as though I was building strength very rapidly. I have run into situations where certain exercises became hard, for example pullups, and to correct this problem, I just switched to a different variation of the exercise. This strategy seemed to allow me to continue gaining; however, as of late, I have been experiencing more difficulties. When I wake up in the morning, I feel very stiff like a tin man and I'm only 21 years old. The problem goes away later on in the day, but I don't have a good feeling about it. I feel that it has gotten to the point where fatigue has built of to a critical level. To correct this problem, I plan to terminate the ptp cycle that I am working on in with my bench press and dead lift, and take a full week off from exercising. I was just wondering, is this a good idea or is there a more appropriate solution?
Thanks
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 10 2005
|
|
Overtraining is probably an issue now and taking a week off is a good idea. In the future, do what Pavel and Jack Reape recommend and do three weeks hard followed by one week moderate (back off week. Also make sure to stretch after each workout and do some joint mobility drills each morning to loosen up. It is not uncommon to feel stiff the next day after a heavy deadlift workout. However, some stretching and joint mobility work will help. Restoration methods are also a good idea. Try icing down your lower back after deadlifts, and the chest and shoulders after bench pressing workouts. Cold/hot showers are also great. 30 seconds cold/60 seconds hot alternated for 5-7 minutes. If you can afford a sports massage then try getting one once a month. That will make a big difference. Finally, make sure to get adjusted by a good chiropracter once a month as well to keep everything in line.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Curt McDonald: March 10 2005
|
|
Sleep loss Question
|
|
Last night I went to bed at 9:00PM and I woke up at 1AM and couldn't go back to sleep. This happened two thursdays ago (last thursday was part of a back off week) also, except I woke up at 3AM (better, still not good though).
For some reason both times it happened on the night of ME BP. I usually do my sessions at about 4:30PM (20-30 min after post-school meal), so I don't think my workouts should affect my sleep. I know this could simply be a coincidence but why does this happen? BTW I normally take melatonin (a sleepy pill) at about 6:30Pm and ZMA closer to bed time about 8:30 (just straight ZMA, globs of B6, Mag and zinc). Even after I woke up at 1AM I took a valerian root which normally knocks me out but it didn't seem to have any affect. Its like my body refused to sleep even though I did a pretty tough workout.
I really hate this because I'm wide awake until about 9:30AM (2nd hour, I'm in HS)
Any one got any ideas?
Thanks
Curt
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 10 2005
|
|
Even if you only get six hours of sleep that night it is better than tossing and turning all night. You can catch up the next night. No point trying to go to sleep if you are not tired. Also, try doing your training earlier. As others have stated your workout is giving your CNS a boost which is like taking a caffeine pill. I think that you would be better off if you can workout around lunch time. Other things that I would try are:
15-20 minute walk to clear your head before bedtime.
hot shower to relax right before bed.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Preston: March 10 2005
|
|
Mike, I got the TNT Power Cable
|
|
...and guess what?
Magenta is not yellow; it's purple. Three of them produce 120
pounds of resistance at 2X elongation. I'm 5'11" and had no trouble
pressing 3 purples 5X. I also ordered 3 reds which at 2X elongation
produces 180 pounds of resistance. I MPed that too 5X.
There is no way that I can double military press (MP) 2 88 pound KBs one time. I may (or may not) be able to MP an 88 pounder one or two times with my stronger arm. I strongly doubt that I can MP an 88 pounder once with my weaker arm.
I'll order the X-Heavy Green cable which at 2X elongation produces
240 pounds of resistance. I want to see whether I can MP 2 reds and a green.
I think you should reconsider your statement that pressing three
"yellows" or 120 pounds of resistance is the equivalent of pressing two 88
pound KBs.
http://forum.dragondoor.com/training/message/320421/
Also, the 120 is at 2X elongation - at lockout, not at the bottom.
Actually, the resistance would depend on how tall you are. If you're 6', you're locking out at a higher level of resistance than someone who is only 5'10"
In my opinion, MP-ing a 120 lb BB is significantly more difficult than
using three purple cables. With a BB it's 120 pounds at the bottom and all
the way up. With bands, it's much easier at the bottom and then you can use momentum to get the handles up. With this momentum, you might even be able to go past the weight you can lift with free weights.
I'm not putting down cables. I like 'em, but their utility needs to be put into perspective.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 11 2005
|
|
Preston, I never said that if you can press three yellow cables that you will be able to press the 88s. I simply stated that I felt that the difficulty level was the same. In other words, I have to work as hard on both to get the job done. I might find pressing a 150lb sandbag hard, but that does not mean that someone who finds pressing a 150lb sandbag easy will be able to press the 88s. I have seen people that can press 205 with a barbell that cannot press two 88s. Does that mean that I am stronger than they are? No, I just have more practice with kettlebells.
My point was that bands teach forced acceleration and that carries over to kettlebells. Individual differences will always be part of the equation. However, getting stronger with bands will help barbell and kettlebell work. Thats why Louie Simmons uses them. To get the transfer you have work both. You cannot just work the bands an be able press heavy kettlebells just as you cannot work just kettlebells and get stronger at the bands. Both compliment one another and both need to be used. Bottom line is bands get harder as you get close to lockout while free weights get easier the closer you get to lockout. Translation, getting stronger as get closer to lockout with bands will allow you to apply one gear strength more efficiently with free weights.
Thanks
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Preston: March 10 2005
|
|
Mike, I got the TNT Power Cable
|
|
...and guess what?
Magenta is not yellow; it's purple. Three of them produce 120
pounds of resistance at 2X elongation. I'm 5'11" and had no trouble
pressing 3 purples 5X. I also ordered 3 reds which at 2X elongation
produces 180 pounds of resistance. I MPed that too 5X.
There is no way that I can double military press (MP) 2 88 pound KBs one time. I may (or may not) be able to MP an 88 pounder one or two times with my stronger arm. I strongly doubt that I can MP an 88 pounder once with my weaker arm.
I'll order the X-Heavy Green cable which at 2X elongation produces
240 pounds of resistance. I want to see whether I can MP 2 reds and a green.
I think you should reconsider your statement that pressing three
"yellows" or 120 pounds of resistance is the equivalent of pressing two 88
pound KBs.
http://forum.dragondoor.com/training/message/320421/
Also, the 120 is at 2X elongation - at lockout, not at the bottom.
Actually, the resistance would depend on how tall you are. If you're 6', you're locking out at a higher level of resistance than someone who is only 5'10"
In my opinion, MP-ing a 120 lb BB is significantly more difficult than
using three purple cables. With a BB it's 120 pounds at the bottom and all
the way up. With bands, it's much easier at the bottom and then you can use momentum to get the handles up. With this momentum, you might even be able to go past the weight you can lift with free weights.
I'm not putting down cables. I like 'em, but their utility needs to be put into perspective.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 10 2005
|
|
Noticed that you stated that pressing the reds was easy for you as well. All I can say is that you are very good at band pressing. I have had several people try pressing three yellows and very few can even get one rep with it. The first time I tried pressing three bands it went nowhere. My max with three yellows is 5 reps. Ask lifeline to cut a few inches of the future bands to make it more difficult. I had them do this with the portable power jumper (black one) and it worked very well.
Are you standing on the bands or attaching it to the bottom of a door? I can tell you that standing on the bands is much much harder.
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Preston: March 10 2005
|
|
Mike, I got the TNT Power Cable
|
|
...and guess what?
Magenta is not yellow; it's purple. Three of them produce 120
pounds of resistance at 2X elongation. I'm 5'11" and had no trouble
pressing 3 purples 5X. I also ordered 3 reds which at 2X elongation
produces 180 pounds of resistance. I MPed that too 5X.
There is no way that I can double military press (MP) 2 88 pound KBs one time. I may (or may not) be able to MP an 88 pounder one or two times with my stronger arm. I strongly doubt that I can MP an 88 pounder once with my weaker arm.
I'll order the X-Heavy Green cable which at 2X elongation produces
240 pounds of resistance. I want to see whether I can MP 2 reds and a green.
I think you should reconsider your statement that pressing three
"yellows" or 120 pounds of resistance is the equivalent of pressing two 88
pound KBs.
http://forum.dragondoor.com/training/message/320421/
Also, the 120 is at 2X elongation - at lockout, not at the bottom.
Actually, the resistance would depend on how tall you are. If you're 6', you're locking out at a higher level of resistance than someone who is only 5'10"
In my opinion, MP-ing a 120 lb BB is significantly more difficult than
using three purple cables. With a BB it's 120 pounds at the bottom and all
the way up. With bands, it's much easier at the bottom and then you can use momentum to get the handles up. With this momentum, you might even be able to go past the weight you can lift with free weights.
I'm not putting down cables. I like 'em, but their utility needs to be put into perspective.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 10 2005
|
|
Pressing three yellows from under the chin is much harder than three purples. Try it out before you slam muy statement. I stand by the statement that three yellows is as difficult as pressig the 88s. How do I know? Because unlike you I have done both.
Again, in your post you stated that pressing three purples was easy. Fine, but I said that pressing three yellows is as difficult as pressing the 88s. I stand behind my statement.
Thanks for your feedback.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Preston: March 10 2005
|
|
Mike, I got the TNT Power Cable
|
|
...and guess what?
Magenta is not yellow; it's purple. Three of them produce 120
pounds of resistance at 2X elongation. I'm 5'11" and had no trouble
pressing 3 purples 5X. I also ordered 3 reds which at 2X elongation
produces 180 pounds of resistance. I MPed that too 5X.
There is no way that I can double military press (MP) 2 88 pound KBs one time. I may (or may not) be able to MP an 88 pounder one or two times with my stronger arm. I strongly doubt that I can MP an 88 pounder once with my weaker arm.
I'll order the X-Heavy Green cable which at 2X elongation produces
240 pounds of resistance. I want to see whether I can MP 2 reds and a green.
I think you should reconsider your statement that pressing three
"yellows" or 120 pounds of resistance is the equivalent of pressing two 88
pound KBs.
http://forum.dragondoor.com/training/message/320421/
Also, the 120 is at 2X elongation - at lockout, not at the bottom.
Actually, the resistance would depend on how tall you are. If you're 6', you're locking out at a higher level of resistance than someone who is only 5'10"
In my opinion, MP-ing a 120 lb BB is significantly more difficult than
using three purple cables. With a BB it's 120 pounds at the bottom and all
the way up. With bands, it's much easier at the bottom and then you can use momentum to get the handles up. With this momentum, you might even be able to go past the weight you can lift with free weights.
I'm not putting down cables. I like 'em, but their utility needs to be put into perspective.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 10 2005
|
|
Try pressing the bands in a controlled manner in which you are as tight as possible at the start. Lower the bands under control, pause at the bottom and press again. Much harder than gunning it up on each rep.
I can press two 70lb bells 15 times (140lbs of resistance) but get stopped at 5 reps with three yellows. Thus, I stand behind my statement about the yellow cables for Mil pressing. I am 6'0 tall and start with the handles under my chin.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Preston: March 10 2005
|
|
Mike, I got the TNT Power Cable
|
|
...and guess what?
Magenta is not yellow; it's purple. Three of them produce 120
pounds of resistance at 2X elongation. I'm 5'11" and had no trouble
pressing 3 purples 5X. I also ordered 3 reds which at 2X elongation
produces 180 pounds of resistance. I MPed that too 5X.
There is no way that I can double military press (MP) 2 88 pound KBs one time. I may (or may not) be able to MP an 88 pounder one or two times with my stronger arm. I strongly doubt that I can MP an 88 pounder once with my weaker arm.
I'll order the X-Heavy Green cable which at 2X elongation produces
240 pounds of resistance. I want to see whether I can MP 2 reds and a green.
I think you should reconsider your statement that pressing three
"yellows" or 120 pounds of resistance is the equivalent of pressing two 88
pound KBs.
http://forum.dragondoor.com/training/message/320421/
Also, the 120 is at 2X elongation - at lockout, not at the bottom.
Actually, the resistance would depend on how tall you are. If you're 6', you're locking out at a higher level of resistance than someone who is only 5'10"
In my opinion, MP-ing a 120 lb BB is significantly more difficult than
using three purple cables. With a BB it's 120 pounds at the bottom and all
the way up. With bands, it's much easier at the bottom and then you can use momentum to get the handles up. With this momentum, you might even be able to go past the weight you can lift with free weights.
I'm not putting down cables. I like 'em, but their utility needs to be put into perspective.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 10 2005
|
|
They also sell blue bands for the TNT cable. The blue bands equal 270lbs at the lockout! I know the president of Lifeline and he sent me a TNT cable set to test drive. He probably sent me a harder set than what others get. I will ask him and get back to you. Is is the only possible soluton as given that you cannot press the 70s (not taking a shot at you) it seems odd that you would be that much stronger than me with the bands.
Thanks
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Preston: March 10 2005
|
|
Mike, I got the TNT Power Cable
|
|
...and guess what?
Magenta is not yellow; it's purple. Three of them produce 120
pounds of resistance at 2X elongation. I'm 5'11" and had no trouble
pressing 3 purples 5X. I also ordered 3 reds which at 2X elongation
produces 180 pounds of resistance. I MPed that too 5X.
There is no way that I can double military press (MP) 2 88 pound KBs one time. I may (or may not) be able to MP an 88 pounder one or two times with my stronger arm. I strongly doubt that I can MP an 88 pounder once with my weaker arm.
I'll order the X-Heavy Green cable which at 2X elongation produces
240 pounds of resistance. I want to see whether I can MP 2 reds and a green.
I think you should reconsider your statement that pressing three
"yellows" or 120 pounds of resistance is the equivalent of pressing two 88
pound KBs.
http://forum.dragondoor.com/training/message/320421/
Also, the 120 is at 2X elongation - at lockout, not at the bottom.
Actually, the resistance would depend on how tall you are. If you're 6', you're locking out at a higher level of resistance than someone who is only 5'10"
In my opinion, MP-ing a 120 lb BB is significantly more difficult than
using three purple cables. With a BB it's 120 pounds at the bottom and all
the way up. With bands, it's much easier at the bottom and then you can use momentum to get the handles up. With this momentum, you might even be able to go past the weight you can lift with free weights.
I'm not putting down cables. I like 'em, but their utility needs to be put into perspective.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 11 2005
|
|
From what I have seen, the westside crew does some rubber resistance only drills for triceps etc and some high rep bench press band only work for active recovery etc. They combine the bands and free weights to get the benefits of both worlds. I am not aware if they use really high resistance band only exercises that model the bench press, squat etc. Good question.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Preston: March 10 2005
|
|
Mike, I got the TNT Power Cable
|
|
...and guess what?
Magenta is not yellow; it's purple. Three of them produce 120
pounds of resistance at 2X elongation. I'm 5'11" and had no trouble
pressing 3 purples 5X. I also ordered 3 reds which at 2X elongation
produces 180 pounds of resistance. I MPed that too 5X.
There is no way that I can double military press (MP) 2 88 pound KBs one time. I may (or may not) be able to MP an 88 pounder one or two times with my stronger arm. I strongly doubt that I can MP an 88 pounder once with my weaker arm.
I'll order the X-Heavy Green cable which at 2X elongation produces
240 pounds of resistance. I want to see whether I can MP 2 reds and a green.
I think you should reconsider your statement that pressing three
"yellows" or 120 pounds of resistance is the equivalent of pressing two 88
pound KBs.
http://forum.dragondoor.com/training/message/320421/
Also, the 120 is at 2X elongation - at lockout, not at the bottom.
Actually, the resistance would depend on how tall you are. If you're 6', you're locking out at a higher level of resistance than someone who is only 5'10"
In my opinion, MP-ing a 120 lb BB is significantly more difficult than
using three purple cables. With a BB it's 120 pounds at the bottom and all
the way up. With bands, it's much easier at the bottom and then you can use momentum to get the handles up. With this momentum, you might even be able to go past the weight you can lift with free weights.
I'm not putting down cables. I like 'em, but their utility needs to be put into perspective.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 10 2005
|
|
Also, whether cables are harder for someone than dumbbells depends on what their weak links are. If you are weak from the middle to lockout with dumbbells you will find cables harder. If you are not then you will probably find cables easier. I sent Jon Hinds a link to your post and asked him to comment here. Hopefully he will soon.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
rifstonian: March 10 2005
|
|
Absolute strength and KB training
|
|
when I stopped all powerlifting ten weeks ago to train for the RKC I thought I had eneough residual strength that the kb only training wouldnt be a problem. Then about 8 weeks in I realized that the heaviest thing I've been picking up was the 2 pood and it was starting to feel heavy. and the 1.5 was ALSO starting to feel "not light".
SO I added in a few singles in the raw dl on saturdays and even after one session I felt better. After the second week I am convinced that I need to keep a heavy lift in the mix somewhere. I'm getting plenty of volume but keeping limit strength decently high makes sense.
thoughts?
rif
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 10 2005
|
|
I agree with your post Mark. However, do you think that you could acquire similar benefits from doing some work with the 88lb bells? How about double swings with 2 70s or 88s, puch presses with the 88s etc?
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Rob Lawrence: March 11 2005
|
|
Who gains strength on singles?
|
|
Looked through over two years of logs last night and confirmed some hunches I'd been having. Namely, I build the most strength on singles, and also seem to get some mileage out of doubles and triples. This seems to apply regardless of the lift in question.
Anything over 1-3 seems to be strength-endurance for me and has almost no carryover to my 1RM. The one quasi-exception would be 20-rep squats, which made me stronger, but likely because they also made me bigger in the process.
I remember reading an article about the Olympic lifter Pete George where he said that for him, "Anything over three reps [was] bodybuilding." At least over the past couple of years, that seems to have applied to me as well.
Over three reps, my mind drifts and I do not get the same level of concentration on each rep.
Rob
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 11 2005
|
|
I have had great results with single rep training on many exercises. However, you cannot do it all the time. Like any other rep range eventually you adapt. I think that starting with singles and working up to three reps witht the same weight before increasing the weight is a great way to avoid burnout. Once you can do three reps with a weight, increase the weight and start with singles again.
Another option is to cycle different forms of single training. Start with rest pause training, then move on to cluster training, then cycle back with Steve Justa's single program, and then do something like Brook's kubik's single program. Basically attacking singles from many angles and levels of intensity.
Also there are other uses for singles. One, doing a few singles (1-3) in the 85% range before your regular workout is a great way to get the CNS jacked up and ready to go.
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Rob Lawrence: March 11 2005
|
|
Who gains strength on singles?
|
|
Looked through over two years of logs last night and confirmed some hunches I'd been having. Namely, I build the most strength on singles, and also seem to get some mileage out of doubles and triples. This seems to apply regardless of the lift in question.
Anything over 1-3 seems to be strength-endurance for me and has almost no carryover to my 1RM. The one quasi-exception would be 20-rep squats, which made me stronger, but likely because they also made me bigger in the process.
I remember reading an article about the Olympic lifter Pete George where he said that for him, "Anything over three reps [was] bodybuilding." At least over the past couple of years, that seems to have applied to me as well.
Over three reps, my mind drifts and I do not get the same level of concentration on each rep.
Rob
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 11 2005
|
|
I agree with you that anything over three and the mind starts to drift. I find that I can stay super tight on sets of three with Mil presses for example, but have to loosen up a little bit to get reps 4 and beyond. On mil press sets of 10 or more it is basically loose from the first rep and tight on the last two.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
dzurilla: March 12 2005
|
|
heavy high volume question
|
|
I'm trying to get big and strong,and increase my lean muscle mass to help burn some fat.Here's my problem,I usually have some sore ness after a workout,lately,nothing. Yesterday I did 12 sets 5 reps,200lbs. on the bench press,I felt pumped yesterday,but today nothing.How can I have a better idea of my progress?Oh yeah,I'm 6'2,235lbs.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 12 2005
|
|
Measuring your workouts by how sore you are the next day or how pumped you are is flawed to say the least. Measure your workouts, by how much stronger you are getting and if fat loss is your goal, check your body fat every two weeks. The pump means nothing. Same with soreness. Also realize that you cannot stay on 12x5 forever, Do it for three weeks, followed by a back off week in which you use 80% trianing intensity for 2-3 sets.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Hrastnik: March 12 2005
|
|
Strength training
|
|
What could I add (if needed) to this routine? Do I need another day or is this enough? My goal is strength (any muscle gain is just a big bonus).
Sat: -deadlifts 5x5
-military press 5x5
-pull ups 5x5 (superset with mpress)
-squats 3x3
Wed: -squats 5x5
-m press 5x5
-pull ups 5x5
-deadlifts 3x3
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 12 2005
|
|
Looks good, i would add a core exercise to each workout. Such as Turkish get-up or hanging leg raises 3x5 at the end of each session. also, try placing a light workout on Monday for actiev recovery. You could do 2x5 on all the same exercises with 50% of what you used on Saturday.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Anders: March 15 2005
|
|
Strength vs. Size. Need Advice
|
|
Hi,
I've been following Pavel's advice for strength training: heavy weight, low reps, as often as possible, as fresh as possible. However, I also wouldn't mind some muscle growth. For this, I know, I need to do more reps, lower weight.
My question: for strength training, I can follow a program of lifting nearly every day if I keep reps low and stay fresh. If I add a lower weight, higher rep component after I'm done with my strength training, can I keep up the frequency?
Should I do the low rep workout every day, and the high rep only a few days? Should I do both together, but fewer days? Or can I do both every day?
Any thoughts appreciated.
Thanks,
David
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 15 2005
|
|
Try Pavel's bear program or follow a 5x5 protocol and then transition into EDT or 10x5 twice a week. For size gains you still want to train heavy and for strength. Just ramp up the volume and calories.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
dzurilla: March 15 2005
|
|
resistance bands
|
|
I'm going to try doing an all bodyweight training schedule,but I'm a little interested in resistance bands,has anyone ever used them with success?
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 15 2005
|
|
To add resistance to bodyweight drills I would get the portable power jumper for squats and the power pushup 2 for pushups. For additional Cable only drills get the TNT cable. For more info on all three go to:
http://www.mikemahler.com/store/
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Ken Love, RKC: March 15 2005
|
|
quetion for pavel and mike mahler re dl and swing.?
|
|
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 16 2005
|
|
I think that you can maintain your deadlift with heavy double swings or at least stay in the ballpark. Personally, my best deadlift is 500lbs and a few months ago I did some deadlifting without having done deadlifts for close to 2 years and pulled 450 without any trouble. I am sure that I could have gotten back up to 500lbs in a few weeks.
I would test your deadlift every two weeks. However, if your main goal is to get better at deadlifting, then keep deadlifting. Double swings will help maintain your deadlift and in some cases improve it, but I would not rely on double swings exclusively.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Ethan Reeve: March 16 2005
|
|
Wednesday's Volleyball Workout.......
|
|
Hey Folks,
Here is today's volleyball workout. They are into their third spring practice day. Practices are in the morning while lifting is is the afternoon.
KB Swings-36 lbs./3x10
Hang Snatch-64 lbs./4x5 Warmup and teaching)
Power Clean-n-Jerk-88+ lbs./5x2 (Climbing)
Glute-Ham Raises-3x10 (supersetted w/ glute-ham situps)
Glute-ham situps-3x10
Bodyweight Toe Raises-50
One Legged Bodyweight Toe Raises-25+25
Pushups-5x6 (Supersetted w/ chins)
Chins-5x6 (we used jump stretch bands for for those struggling w/ chins)
Core Work Routine
Farmer's Walk-53 lbers./86 yards
Suitcase Walk Right Hand-53 lber./86 yards
Suitcase Walk Left Hand-53 lber./86 yards
Team Stretch
Fairly good workout! 60 mins. in length.
In Strength,
Ethan Reeve
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 16 2005
|
|
Coach, can you go over the benefits of the bodyweight toe raises? Also, do you ever have people do toe raises will holding onto a kettlebell or some other form of resistance. Thanks
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
DanielB: March 17 2005
|
|
ART certification
|
|
I want to do the ART certification, how much will my bachelors degree in religious studies help me? :)
seriosly, anyone who is certified or do some kind of bodywork,
how should I best prepare myself for this?
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 17 2005
|
|
And I got great jobs after I graduated from school and run a profitable training business. It is not necessarily your degree that gets you a good job or business, but you. That said, I am a big fan of ART and it has worked wonders on injuries that I used to have (notice I said used to). I recommend it highly if you want to get in the field. I would talk to some ART practitioners in your area.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
rufus22: March 17 2005
|
|
clean and press and pttp
|
|
I just bought the book (Power to the People). I know that the deadlift and the press is recomended , but I like the clean and press so my question is can one sub. the c&p for the dead and press and still follow the same routine in the book. thanks
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 17 2005
|
|
Chances are that the weight you are using for the clean and press will not be that heavy that it takes anything away from deadlifting. Moreover, it will probably act as a good warm-up for deadlifting.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
mrjack: March 17 2005
|
|
HONESTY PLEASE:-Clean or Not??
|
|
Not suggesting otherwise but how many people can honestly say they have never juiced!
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 17 2005
|
|
Just kidding. Steroids don't appeal to me because I feel that the gains that you make on them are fleeting. You are basically borrowing the gains and then have to give it back at some point. In some cases the health related problems that come from excessive steroid use make you weaker than before you started training.
I think that steroids could be taken safely under medical supervision(assuming the doctor knows what he is doing). Another problem with steroids is that from my understanding they make the muscles stronger, but not the tendons. The tendons simply cannot keep up with the muscle growth which is a big problem if you keep training heavier and heavier. Regardless, I am not a steroid expert and have never really taken the time to research the subject extensively as I have never been interested in taking them.
Another problem I see with steroids is the psychological addiction. I think that the increased T-levels and strength would be addictive and hard to give up. It takes a very discplined person to handle this aspect. I would rather not find out if I have the discipline.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
determined66: March 21 2005
|
|
handstand pushups mike mahler, pavel or anyone......
|
|
Could anyone clearly define the different kinds of hspu's that are referred to on this form. For example is a fullrange hspu one where your feet are touching the wall or not? Also could anybody who regularily does this exercise post some of their PRs and training schedules. Just want something to shoot for and some numbers to check my ego (just started hspu's the other day to combine with sandbag training and did 7 head touching floor hspu's against the wall with legs sraight).
Thanks in advance guys and gals
Craig Vogel
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 22 2005
|
|
A full range handstand pushups would require two stools or chairs so that the range of motion is equal to that of the Military Press. If it is against a wall it is not free standing. Thus a full range free standing handstand pushup would be done on two stools or chairs and no wall or anyone holding your feet. Very impressive move. I saw John Alstadt (johnny pullups) do it once.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Robby: March 21 2005
|
|
Need some help with the Military Press...
|
|
One of my goals for the next month or 2 is to move up to pressing the 2-pood.
I can MP the 1.5's for 5x5 on the double MP, but I still can't quite get a single rep with 1 2-pood.
I can jerk it, and do partail presses to right around Para Press depth, with my upper arm parallel to the ground or slighly lower.
Where I have trouble is at the start of the press, right off the rack position. I can't get the bell from the rack to Para Press position.
What are some ways to train the lower part of the MP? the Static Contraction methos doesn't seem to help.
Thanks in advance for any help, Robby
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 21 2005
|
|
One, you could have a weak foundation to press off of. How strong are your legs? Two, you could have shoulder stability issues which are preventing you from keeping the bell in line to get it going. Work on TGU's and windmills. Next, given that you can do 5x5 with the lighter bells, it could be a confidence issue. The weight just feels heavy to you. Make sure that you squeeze the handles as hard as possible. Everything starts with the grip. If that is weak, the rest of the chain will be weak as well. Brett Jones stated at the convention that his strength has gone up tremendously with kettlebells from using Ironmind grippers. Get a pair. Finally, work on doing push presses with the 2 pood. Push press the first rep, lower slowly to heady level and press the bell back up(not push press). Gradually work down until you are doing a full mil press.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
fusionman: March 22 2005
|
|
Question about Cardio?
|
|
I know that a person should take breaks between lifting sessions, but should they also take breaks from cardio? I cycle for 50 min. every day, but am wondering if this is destructive to muscles. I don't really feel any pain in my legs, (just a little tension) but should I alternate days or keep up the every day bike ride? Thanks for any insight.
-Nick
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 22 2005
|
|
Sounds like you are biking for fun and for some cardio. If you want to get stronger, I would reduce the biking to three 45 minute sessions per week, or 20 minutes per day. Depends on what the intensity is like as well. Take note of how your strength training is progressing. If it is slower than you would like, you may already have the answer.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
brian: March 23 2005
|
|
Need some advice
|
|
Hello,
I am considering an investment into kettlebells. I was hoping to obtain some advice regarding my situation. I am presently a bodybuilder who trains in boxing and mma for cardio purposes only. I can fully appreciate the superiority of kettlebells compared to weight training for applied strength and conditioning. With physique appearance being my most important goal, I would like to keep my bodybuilding (weightraining) at its current split of 3-4 days per week along with boxing 3-4 times per week. I am worried that if I incorporate kettlebell training into my routine I will be overtraining. The possible split I was thinking was Mon, Wed, and Fri weightraining/cardio. Tue, Thur, Sat kettlebells/cardio. Do you think this would be effective and avoid overtraining? Are any of you incorporating kettlebells into an already existing weightraining regimen? I appreciate your feedback.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 23 2005
|
|
you would be doing an unncessary work load that is counterproductive. Why not use kettlebells for cardio and core work, and stick to compound barbell moves for strength training/bodybuilding. Two workouts of each per week is a good place to start. Remember to focus on results not workout stimulus.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
determined66: March 23 2005
|
|
To mike mahler or pavel
|
|
I was thinking about getting some kettlebells but don't know where to start. I can swing an 80 lb dumbell five times (without going to failure) with one arm and two 55's four times. I want to get the kettlebells for swings,snatches and presses. I can press a 170lb barbell for reps. I guess my main question is how do swings with a dumbell compare to swings with a kettlebell and also what is the translation between pressing strength on a barbell and kettlebells (Mike stated before that it is a pretty close carryover). If I were to buy two kettlebells should I get two 55's or two 70's.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 23 2005
|
|
As Catherine Stated below, the best move that you could make is to make an appointment with an RKC so you can test drive a variety of bells and see what is a fit for you. You have the strength now to press two 70lb bells and do swings with it. However, it does take time to get the technique down which varies with each individual.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
determined66: March 23 2005
|
|
To mike mahler or pavel
|
|
I was thinking about getting some kettlebells but don't know where to start. I can swing an 80 lb dumbell five times (without going to failure) with one arm and two 55's four times. I want to get the kettlebells for swings,snatches and presses. I can press a 170lb barbell for reps. I guess my main question is how do swings with a dumbell compare to swings with a kettlebell and also what is the translation between pressing strength on a barbell and kettlebells (Mike stated before that it is a pretty close carryover). If I were to buy two kettlebells should I get two 55's or two 70's.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 23 2005
|
|
If you are only going to do swings, snatches, and presses, then get two 70s. However, if you ever plan on doing other excellent KB drills such as windmills, TGU's, side presses, etc, you will want a lighter bell to learn the form.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
John Du Cane: March 28 2005
|
|
Until March 31: $5.00 off Steve Cotter's new kettlebell DVD
|
|
Steve Cotter excellent new DVD is now available from Dragon Door and will be shipping approximately April 1st.
For full details click on the link at the bottom of this post or read the rest of this post:
"In Full KONtact Kettlebells Vol. 2 Steve Cotter reverse engineers the body language of an expert fighter through expert use of Russian kettlebells. Even if you are not a fighter, buy this DVD for three unique midsection drills and Cotter's trademark leg exercises applicable to many sports."
—Pavel Tsatsouline, Chief Instructor, Russian Kettlebell Challenge
(Full KOntact Kettlebells, Volume 2: Applied Strength)
The Martial Art of Strength Training Series
With Steve Cotter
Running Time: 76 Minutes
Volume 2 of this powerful conditioning series, Applied Strength, brings kettlebell training to the pinnacle of functional strength training—fighting strength. Never before has the kettlebell been presented so clearly as a tool for developing fighting technique and power.
National Kung Fu Champion, Steve Cotter shows you how to use utilize your kettlebells to strengthen specific Ranges of Motion that will improve your leverage for striking and throwing techniques.
Learn how the body mechanics needed to move heavy loads can be applied to moving opponents in the ring, on the field, or in your arena of choice. Steve Cotter shows you how combining strength training with precise movement and correct positioning gives you the advantage over your competition!
Steve Cotter is a world-renowned martial artist and strength & conditioning specialist. He has merged his experience as a US National Full Contact Kung Fu Champion, internal martial art instructor and cutting-edge trainer with his expertise as a Senior Russian Kettlebell Challenge instructor to develop innovative and comprehensive programs for martial artists and other combat specialists.
With his 25 years of experience as a world-class martial artist, athlete, and coach, he specializes in the design and supervision of perfectly balanced training programs for fighters and other individuals committed to serious conditioning and fitness. His unique approach bridges time-tested training methods of the internal martial arts and the latest research-based modalities for athletic training. The end results are maximal mind-body performance, deep strength, and unsurpassed athleticism.
One of the characteristics that separates Steve among trainers is his ability to apply simple concepts and techniques into a martial context. Every useful technique is either a martial technique in disguise, or a conditioning method to augment overall skill development. Considered by many to be the world authority on one leg squats and low basin strength training, Steve is uniquely qualified to help his students lay the foundation for power development in his or her chosen application.
Steve Cotter’s professional accreditations include:
2 time US Full Contact Champion
Team Member, USA National Kuoshu Team
Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist (CSCS) - National Strength & Conditioning Association (NSCA)
Senior Russian Kettlebell Challenge Instructor (RKC, Sr.)
Creator of FULL K.O.NTACT KETTLEBELLS™ System and best-selling DVD series
Certified Health/Fitness Instructor- American Colleges of Sports Medicine (ACSM)
B.S. in Kinesiology, San Diego State University
BOSU™ Master Trainer
Certified USA Weightlifting Club Coach
Contents
(Qigong) Preparation and Warm-Up:
Learn to release the tension and enter your training with complete focus
Coordinate your neuromuscular system through deep breathing and rhythmical movements
Massage the internal organs for health and learn how to brace for heavy loads with diaphragmatic breathing
Kettlebell Techniques and Applications:
Review Key components from volume 1: Root:
Conditioning in positions of strength and positions of Extreme Compromise
Shuffling: Learn distancing and controlled movement
Lateral Shuffling: Evasion for counter-attacking
Weaving: Slipping with follow-ups
Dragon Twisting: assorted take-downs
Rotations: strengthen the abdominal obliques while maintaining a tight guard; Overhead rotations are an advanced core strengthener; develop the muscles used in ‘short-range’ striking
Bagua Circular Stepping: precise footwork and base lay the foundation for positioning in all forms of movement. For martial arts, evasive footwork and continuous movement develops pinpoint accuracy and balance. As a form of exercise this pattern loosens every joint in the body. This takes your spatial awareness to another level!
Hook Swings: train the stance and torch the abs, grip and arms; develop rock-like stability in your movements
Lateral Swings with pivot step: centerline practice develops great body control while blasting the lats and obliques; simple and powerful as a self-defense manuever
Rotations with Iron Wall: This kick defense trains every aspect of the abdominals through its tri-planar stabilization; try this and you’ll never lie down to train your abs again!
Catch & Sweep: this devastating throw is a great way to train flexibility and build powerful thighs. Your legs will come alive!
Clean & Drop: strengthen and loosen the hips; shows how a powerful stance can repel would-be attackers
Alternating Snatch: a great metabolic conditioner; and a surprisingly effective tactic for self-defense
Screw Press: this old-time classic builds a thick, powerful waist, and lays the foundation for brutal hip and shoulder throws.
General Conditioning and Agility for Martial Arts and Impact Athletes:
Multi-Level Slipping: for pronounced hip strength and flexibility, this is a killer and will challenge everyone; drop sets for the hard-core!
Towel Swings: 5 levels different levels, from beginner through advanced, this is an amazing core and grip strengthener; grapplers will throw their opponents around with the strength developed here
Duck Squats and Walking: develop ‘springy leg’ endurance and freedom of motion in all ranges and directions
Duck Walk and Press: an amazing whole body coordination exercise, this makes all your lifts easy by comparison
Side to Side Creepdown and Press: this goes well beyond basic training and will open your hips like no other drill
Dynamic Flexibility:
Shoulder Dislocates and Figure 8: opens the chest and keeps the shoulders supple and pliable — very important for grapplers
Side-to-Side Creep Down/Cossacks stretch: fundamental for applying low stance applications such as grappling and take downs, blocking, tackling, etc
“As a Police Sergeant and a Defensive Tactics Trainer for the San Diego City Schools Police Department, I can honestly say that I credit much of my success in law enforcement to the training I received from Steve’s company, Limit-Liability Corporation (LLC). Steve’s new training methods have been embraced by local law enforcement and have influenced Defensive Tactics training throughout the County of San Diego. Steve’s Full K.O.ntact Kettlebells training program is phenomenal.”
—Sergeant Rueben Q. Littlejohn, San Diego City School Police Department
“I just wanted to congratulate you on your great work. The explanations are thorough, logical, and you've done a great job in explaining the martial arts carryover from KB training.”
—Charles Staley, Staley Training Systems, Las Vegas, NV
Full KOntact Kettlebells, Volume 2 gives you a whole new way of understanding strength training for martial arts. The lifts are taught from the perspective of practical application. For the first time, Steve Cotter shows you step-by-step how you can use kettlebell training in a way that will prepare your body most effectively for the specific demands of martial arts and impact sports.
http://www.dragondoor.com/dv025.html
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 28 2005
|
|
I have not seen the entire DVD, but Steve showed me some clips in Vegas and I was impressed. IF you are a martial artist, you have to get it as Steve shows clearly how the exercises carry over to the fighting world. If you are not, the DVD is still a must have, as the drills that I saw looked great for strength and conditioning.
Mike Mahler
|
|
|
|
Question
|
peteK: March 30 2005
|
|
Negatives
|
|
Pavel, what's your opinion on the frequent use of negatives in one's training. At least for someone interested in size more than strength (a bodybuilder)
cheers
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 30 2005
|
|
You want to do the negative under control for strength, but not waste a lot of time and energy on it. For size, studies have shown that lowering a heavy weight induces more hypertrophy than the concentric portion. Negatives are also a good way to build confidence for heavier weights. For example, push press an 88lb kettlebell and lower it under control to a count of 5. Contract every muscle and pull it down. Confidence is an overlooked part of strength training and a critical component to handling heavier weights.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Jason C. Brown RKC: March 30 2005
|
|
Attn. Dylan
|
|
you can add Mike Johnson,police officer, to the list of people that may be insulted by your implications that poeple that don't agree with the snatch requirement are gutless. Check the last thread if you don't know what I'm talking about.
Jason C. Brown
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 30 2005
|
|
I know Dylan well and just read his post. I do not believe that it was his intention to insult anyone with his post. Dylan simply believes in solid standards. He knows Mike J and has always said good things about him, so I really doubt that he was insulting Mike or anyone else.
I agree with others that passing the snatch test does not make one a great instructer, but it does demonstrate being in shape which is an important part of being an RKC. What many people do not realize is that all of the RKC students are tested on all of the core exercises: (presses, windmills, front squats, TGU etc) They do not have to use a certain bell or achieve a certain level of reps, but they do have to demonstrate each exercise with solid form. It is up to the Senior RKC to decide if their form is acceptable. Thus, one could pass the snatch test and still fail the course, if they cannot demonstrate solid form on all exercises. Again this is up to the Senior RKC to make the final determination.
In addition, at the last few RKC Certs, RKC students have to teach others while Senior RKC's observe their teaching abilities. This is another important aspect of the course that students are tested on. How well they relate to students, convery ideas, follow safety protocols etc
I think that the discussion here is great and that the course can be improved. I am sure that it will be improved with all of the great feedback that people have taken the time to post.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Jason C. Brown RKC: March 30 2005
|
|
Attn. Dylan
|
|
you can add Mike Johnson,police officer, to the list of people that may be insulted by your implications that poeple that don't agree with the snatch requirement are gutless. Check the last thread if you don't know what I'm talking about.
Jason C. Brown
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 30 2005
|
|
I don't want to speak for Dylan and will wait for his response to your post. I think that you bring up a good point. The ad copy should reflect the other tests and grading that occurs at the RKC. I will pass this on to Pavel and John in case they do not see your post.
Mike Mahler
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Frankie: March 31 2005
|
|
SNATCH TEST: It was wise to increase the RKC snatch #'s
|
|
I have already made one post about this and it was going to be my only post but.... I forgot to mention something about my RKC experience and had a small epiphany.
My RKC was the last RKC with the low# snatch test. I had to do 14/14. If done today, I would have to do 28/28. I wish I would have had to.
I reinjured myself right before lunch of the 2nd day during Steve Maxwell's workout. It wasn't his nor anyone else's fault. Injury is part of the game. Here is a fact: MY KB TRAINING previous to the RKC didn't make me resilient enough to do 3 days of 6-8 hours of (sporadic) KB lifting.
Listen 3 days is a BIG DEAL! Probably at no other time in anyone's training will one ever do 3 days (6-8 hours) of KB lifting. Low rep, low volume training isn't going to build resiliency as well as the higher rep ballistic work of snatches will. If you have the resiliency, you can make it through the RKC. You will have some cumulative fatigue, though.
I can't help but think that if I had trained for 28/28, my body would have been able to last through the RKC. Instead, I get injured and the last half of the RKC wasn't very enjoyable.
As quite a few are clearly missing, the snatch test is an ENTRY TEST not an EXIT TEST. It was meant to show the instructors that you have the resiliency to make it through the course. If they wanted to be real conservative for safety's sake, it would make sense for them to send someone home right away if they couldn't pass.
I think GS style should be enforced. Working one side continuously is more taxing to the body than USSS style and more efficient to reach that critical level of challenge. More taxation = more preparation. More preparation = higher safety.
I think there is a lot of wisdom behind the higher rep snatch test. I would only change the test if there was a test that inspired training that would lead to an even higher level of physical preparedness. I think the snatch test, like the KB and the rest of Pavel's methods is simple, effective and far reaching.
Keep it.
Frankie
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
Many instructers such as myself, Steve Cotter, and Jeff Martone travel all over the place doing seminars. All three of us have taught at several RKC's and offer great preparation for an RKC. Personally, I have had at least 25 go from my seminar to an RKC and do well. Of course,there are other options as there are plenty of active RKC's all over the place.
For people on the east coast, they can fly to Steve Maxwell's gym and take some classes and privates. On the west coast, you have Ironcore, myself, Missy Beaver (Missy is an awesome instructer) Mike Castrogiovanni in NoCal and soon you Mark! What about Anthony of Punch Gym in Rhode Island. You have Crossfit north in Washington State, Dave Whitley in TN, Lisa Schaffer in Texas, Dylan Thomas in VA, Eric Johnson in Ohio,and tons of active instructers all of the US and overseas. Sure, it may not be convenient for everyone in the US, but flying out to Minneapolis and spending $2000.00 and then failing is hardly convenient. Getting some instruction before going to an RKC is a smart idea especially if you have any doubt. Showing up with no experience at all is an insult to your classmates and instructers. Now we have to waste time on people that should have the basics down. After all the RKC is an instructer course, not a user course.
Bottom line is that the US is full of great instructers all over the place so there is no excuse for getting adequate preparation.
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Frankie: March 31 2005
|
|
SNATCH TEST: It was wise to increase the RKC snatch #'s
|
|
I have already made one post about this and it was going to be my only post but.... I forgot to mention something about my RKC experience and had a small epiphany.
My RKC was the last RKC with the low# snatch test. I had to do 14/14. If done today, I would have to do 28/28. I wish I would have had to.
I reinjured myself right before lunch of the 2nd day during Steve Maxwell's workout. It wasn't his nor anyone else's fault. Injury is part of the game. Here is a fact: MY KB TRAINING previous to the RKC didn't make me resilient enough to do 3 days of 6-8 hours of (sporadic) KB lifting.
Listen 3 days is a BIG DEAL! Probably at no other time in anyone's training will one ever do 3 days (6-8 hours) of KB lifting. Low rep, low volume training isn't going to build resiliency as well as the higher rep ballistic work of snatches will. If you have the resiliency, you can make it through the RKC. You will have some cumulative fatigue, though.
I can't help but think that if I had trained for 28/28, my body would have been able to last through the RKC. Instead, I get injured and the last half of the RKC wasn't very enjoyable.
As quite a few are clearly missing, the snatch test is an ENTRY TEST not an EXIT TEST. It was meant to show the instructors that you have the resiliency to make it through the course. If they wanted to be real conservative for safety's sake, it would make sense for them to send someone home right away if they couldn't pass.
I think GS style should be enforced. Working one side continuously is more taxing to the body than USSS style and more efficient to reach that critical level of challenge. More taxation = more preparation. More preparation = higher safety.
I think there is a lot of wisdom behind the higher rep snatch test. I would only change the test if there was a test that inspired training that would lead to an even higher level of physical preparedness. I think the snatch test, like the KB and the rest of Pavel's methods is simple, effective and far reaching.
Keep it.
Frankie
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
Mark,
When I say clean and press for reps, I do not mean super high reps. 10 reps with two 70s for example shows both strength and endurance for people that are 200 and above. 10 reps with 2 53s for people 165 and other is also great. I agree that the focus should be on teaching people how to teach. No doubt. But, I don't want fat out of shape trainers out there who simply have training knowledge. That makes the rest of us look bad who work are asses off to stay in shape and be good instructers. I really do not see how the two are mutually exclusive. I do not think that it is too much to ask for instructers to be solid teachers and in good shape. We cannot expect everyone to be mutants like Cotter, Jones, and Mike Castrogiovani, but we should have solid physical standards.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Frankie: March 31 2005
|
|
SNATCH TEST: It was wise to increase the RKC snatch #'s
|
|
I have already made one post about this and it was going to be my only post but.... I forgot to mention something about my RKC experience and had a small epiphany.
My RKC was the last RKC with the low# snatch test. I had to do 14/14. If done today, I would have to do 28/28. I wish I would have had to.
I reinjured myself right before lunch of the 2nd day during Steve Maxwell's workout. It wasn't his nor anyone else's fault. Injury is part of the game. Here is a fact: MY KB TRAINING previous to the RKC didn't make me resilient enough to do 3 days of 6-8 hours of (sporadic) KB lifting.
Listen 3 days is a BIG DEAL! Probably at no other time in anyone's training will one ever do 3 days (6-8 hours) of KB lifting. Low rep, low volume training isn't going to build resiliency as well as the higher rep ballistic work of snatches will. If you have the resiliency, you can make it through the RKC. You will have some cumulative fatigue, though.
I can't help but think that if I had trained for 28/28, my body would have been able to last through the RKC. Instead, I get injured and the last half of the RKC wasn't very enjoyable.
As quite a few are clearly missing, the snatch test is an ENTRY TEST not an EXIT TEST. It was meant to show the instructors that you have the resiliency to make it through the course. If they wanted to be real conservative for safety's sake, it would make sense for them to send someone home right away if they couldn't pass.
I think GS style should be enforced. Working one side continuously is more taxing to the body than USSS style and more efficient to reach that critical level of challenge. More taxation = more preparation. More preparation = higher safety.
I think there is a lot of wisdom behind the higher rep snatch test. I would only change the test if there was a test that inspired training that would lead to an even higher level of physical preparedness. I think the snatch test, like the KB and the rest of Pavel's methods is simple, effective and far reaching.
Keep it.
Frankie
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
We have actually had people attend RKC's that have never touched a kettlebells before? That is simply ridiculous and unacceptable. The test forces people to take the course more seriosuly. As others have stated, people that want to be RKC's should get with an RKC for some classes, workshops, or privates before attending an RKC. People should already have decent form before showing up. Then we can take it up a notch at the RKC and focus on building better instructers.
People are talking about how the focus should be on building solid instructers. Well, show up with better form so we have more time to focus on that. A large chunk of people show up with horrible form and that is not acceptable and frankly disrespectful. We expect more proactive people.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Frankie: March 31 2005
|
|
SNATCH TEST: It was wise to increase the RKC snatch #'s
|
|
I have already made one post about this and it was going to be my only post but.... I forgot to mention something about my RKC experience and had a small epiphany.
My RKC was the last RKC with the low# snatch test. I had to do 14/14. If done today, I would have to do 28/28. I wish I would have had to.
I reinjured myself right before lunch of the 2nd day during Steve Maxwell's workout. It wasn't his nor anyone else's fault. Injury is part of the game. Here is a fact: MY KB TRAINING previous to the RKC didn't make me resilient enough to do 3 days of 6-8 hours of (sporadic) KB lifting.
Listen 3 days is a BIG DEAL! Probably at no other time in anyone's training will one ever do 3 days (6-8 hours) of KB lifting. Low rep, low volume training isn't going to build resiliency as well as the higher rep ballistic work of snatches will. If you have the resiliency, you can make it through the RKC. You will have some cumulative fatigue, though.
I can't help but think that if I had trained for 28/28, my body would have been able to last through the RKC. Instead, I get injured and the last half of the RKC wasn't very enjoyable.
As quite a few are clearly missing, the snatch test is an ENTRY TEST not an EXIT TEST. It was meant to show the instructors that you have the resiliency to make it through the course. If they wanted to be real conservative for safety's sake, it would make sense for them to send someone home right away if they couldn't pass.
I think GS style should be enforced. Working one side continuously is more taxing to the body than USSS style and more efficient to reach that critical level of challenge. More taxation = more preparation. More preparation = higher safety.
I think there is a lot of wisdom behind the higher rep snatch test. I would only change the test if there was a test that inspired training that would lead to an even higher level of physical preparedness. I think the snatch test, like the KB and the rest of Pavel's methods is simple, effective and far reaching.
Keep it.
Frankie
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
You have injuries etc, but are not using that as an excuse. Instead you are working with Mike C and Brett to get your form up to speed and putting in a lot of hard work. In other words you are talking the RKC seriously rather than just showing up and seeing what happens. That is exactly what I like to see at the RKC certs! Your idea of using the swing as the fit test is an interesting one. Worth thinking about.
Mike Mahler
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Frankie: March 31 2005
|
|
SNATCH TEST: It was wise to increase the RKC snatch #'s
|
|
I have already made one post about this and it was going to be my only post but.... I forgot to mention something about my RKC experience and had a small epiphany.
My RKC was the last RKC with the low# snatch test. I had to do 14/14. If done today, I would have to do 28/28. I wish I would have had to.
I reinjured myself right before lunch of the 2nd day during Steve Maxwell's workout. It wasn't his nor anyone else's fault. Injury is part of the game. Here is a fact: MY KB TRAINING previous to the RKC didn't make me resilient enough to do 3 days of 6-8 hours of (sporadic) KB lifting.
Listen 3 days is a BIG DEAL! Probably at no other time in anyone's training will one ever do 3 days (6-8 hours) of KB lifting. Low rep, low volume training isn't going to build resiliency as well as the higher rep ballistic work of snatches will. If you have the resiliency, you can make it through the RKC. You will have some cumulative fatigue, though.
I can't help but think that if I had trained for 28/28, my body would have been able to last through the RKC. Instead, I get injured and the last half of the RKC wasn't very enjoyable.
As quite a few are clearly missing, the snatch test is an ENTRY TEST not an EXIT TEST. It was meant to show the instructors that you have the resiliency to make it through the course. If they wanted to be real conservative for safety's sake, it would make sense for them to send someone home right away if they couldn't pass.
I think GS style should be enforced. Working one side continuously is more taxing to the body than USSS style and more efficient to reach that critical level of challenge. More taxation = more preparation. More preparation = higher safety.
I think there is a lot of wisdom behind the higher rep snatch test. I would only change the test if there was a test that inspired training that would lead to an even higher level of physical preparedness. I think the snatch test, like the KB and the rest of Pavel's methods is simple, effective and far reaching.
Keep it.
Frankie
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
If you have already said so, I apologize. I have been busy on the east coast with family matters and have not had a chance to spend too much time on the forum this week. One of my ideas was to test the Clean and Press for reps. What do you think about that? I would like to hear your ideas.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemaher.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Frankie: March 31 2005
|
|
SNATCH TEST: It was wise to increase the RKC snatch #'s
|
|
I have already made one post about this and it was going to be my only post but.... I forgot to mention something about my RKC experience and had a small epiphany.
My RKC was the last RKC with the low# snatch test. I had to do 14/14. If done today, I would have to do 28/28. I wish I would have had to.
I reinjured myself right before lunch of the 2nd day during Steve Maxwell's workout. It wasn't his nor anyone else's fault. Injury is part of the game. Here is a fact: MY KB TRAINING previous to the RKC didn't make me resilient enough to do 3 days of 6-8 hours of (sporadic) KB lifting.
Listen 3 days is a BIG DEAL! Probably at no other time in anyone's training will one ever do 3 days (6-8 hours) of KB lifting. Low rep, low volume training isn't going to build resiliency as well as the higher rep ballistic work of snatches will. If you have the resiliency, you can make it through the RKC. You will have some cumulative fatigue, though.
I can't help but think that if I had trained for 28/28, my body would have been able to last through the RKC. Instead, I get injured and the last half of the RKC wasn't very enjoyable.
As quite a few are clearly missing, the snatch test is an ENTRY TEST not an EXIT TEST. It was meant to show the instructors that you have the resiliency to make it through the course. If they wanted to be real conservative for safety's sake, it would make sense for them to send someone home right away if they couldn't pass.
I think GS style should be enforced. Working one side continuously is more taxing to the body than USSS style and more efficient to reach that critical level of challenge. More taxation = more preparation. More preparation = higher safety.
I think there is a lot of wisdom behind the higher rep snatch test. I would only change the test if there was a test that inspired training that would lead to an even higher level of physical preparedness. I think the snatch test, like the KB and the rest of Pavel's methods is simple, effective and far reaching.
Keep it.
Frankie
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
However, in the years to come there will be instructers all over the place. Working with instructers before the RKC is a good idea if you can do it. Otherwise, you have to do the best with what you have and go for it.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
DylanThomas,RKC: March 31 2005
|
|
Jason C Brown,RKC. I stand firm on my post
|
|
If someone was insulted by my post,than they need a thicker skin.
I mentioned that I thought that those with injuries and conditions should get special consideration.
At the same time,if you are going to spend over $1,000 on something and there is a testing requirment that worries you,than you better GUT UP,Shut up and train. If that is insulting,then so be it.It should'nt be insulting,it should be taken as good strait honest encouragement.
BTW My intention was'nt to insult,but yours clearly is. Your the guy that called Mike Mahler "The Joe Weider of Kettlebells." or something to that effect.You have alot of nerve calling the Kettlebell black.
Where in there did I insult Mike Johnson? I have nothing but respect for him,and I agree with many of his points. Don't try to start something between us that does not exsist.
These are my veiws based on my exp. wich is a little more than the average K'beller,but not as much as some.
I never said I was the toughest guy around,where did I ever say or imply that? I'm a hard target ,that's for sure.You don't get that way making excusses,you get that way from hard shugyo (austere training)
Look, you don't need an RKC cert to be a KB instructor,I was doing it before I got certified,but that said, the cert is well worth it,and I feel that the bar should be set fairly high and stay high.(with the exception of those I mentioned in the first paragraph,they will have to play to their strengths,with an eye on itheir shortcomings. Just like ALL OF US.)
You tend to kneejerk a bit to much Jason,you might want to watch that in the future.JMO
You know one of the things that attracted me to Pavel's writtings besides the great training info and insight? His brutal honesty and the way he did'nt mence words.
As for saying it to Marines,well enough of them like my approach to have invited me down to Systems Command-Raids and Recon in Quantico, to demo and teach K'belling to some hard charging,never bitching warriors.I hold their opinion much higher than yours.
BTW I know I spell like a 5th grader,why,because the schools I went to were more about warehousing kids and hoping no one beats,stabs or shoots anyone. If standards were higher and discplin enforced,maybe I would have done better at spelling and learned to type,instead of teaching myself history and other subjects by reading books.
I was running multi millon dollar contracts in commercial/goverment construction when I was 23,not bad for someone who can't spell,we had office staff to dot the I's and cross the T's.
Good luck with your training and business.
SHUGYO!
Dylan
http://dylanzthomas@yahoo.com
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
And I don't think that anyone is calling your gutless. I agree that making the snatch test harder is not the way to go, but making it easier is not as well. Others tests is another option. I think giving people alternative tests such as using a heavier bell for less reps on the snatch, or doing clean and presses or swings is a good idea.
No need to apologize about the JW comment. You have a right to your opinion. However, I think that calling me the "Gene Simmons" of the KB community would be more appropriate. Well, at least in my own mind, ha ha
I am going to be in Muscle and Fitness soon so I maybe the title of the article can be the Joe Weider of the Kb world, ha ha
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
DylanThomas,RKC: March 31 2005
|
|
Jason C Brown,RKC. I stand firm on my post
|
|
If someone was insulted by my post,than they need a thicker skin.
I mentioned that I thought that those with injuries and conditions should get special consideration.
At the same time,if you are going to spend over $1,000 on something and there is a testing requirment that worries you,than you better GUT UP,Shut up and train. If that is insulting,then so be it.It should'nt be insulting,it should be taken as good strait honest encouragement.
BTW My intention was'nt to insult,but yours clearly is. Your the guy that called Mike Mahler "The Joe Weider of Kettlebells." or something to that effect.You have alot of nerve calling the Kettlebell black.
Where in there did I insult Mike Johnson? I have nothing but respect for him,and I agree with many of his points. Don't try to start something between us that does not exsist.
These are my veiws based on my exp. wich is a little more than the average K'beller,but not as much as some.
I never said I was the toughest guy around,where did I ever say or imply that? I'm a hard target ,that's for sure.You don't get that way making excusses,you get that way from hard shugyo (austere training)
Look, you don't need an RKC cert to be a KB instructor,I was doing it before I got certified,but that said, the cert is well worth it,and I feel that the bar should be set fairly high and stay high.(with the exception of those I mentioned in the first paragraph,they will have to play to their strengths,with an eye on itheir shortcomings. Just like ALL OF US.)
You tend to kneejerk a bit to much Jason,you might want to watch that in the future.JMO
You know one of the things that attracted me to Pavel's writtings besides the great training info and insight? His brutal honesty and the way he did'nt mence words.
As for saying it to Marines,well enough of them like my approach to have invited me down to Systems Command-Raids and Recon in Quantico, to demo and teach K'belling to some hard charging,never bitching warriors.I hold their opinion much higher than yours.
BTW I know I spell like a 5th grader,why,because the schools I went to were more about warehousing kids and hoping no one beats,stabs or shoots anyone. If standards were higher and discplin enforced,maybe I would have done better at spelling and learned to type,instead of teaching myself history and other subjects by reading books.
I was running multi millon dollar contracts in commercial/goverment construction when I was 23,not bad for someone who can't spell,we had office staff to dot the I's and cross the T's.
Good luck with your training and business.
SHUGYO!
Dylan
http://dylanzthomas@yahoo.com
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
Whether you agree with him or not, Dylan stands behind what he says and backs up his arguments well and you have to respect that. Dylan is also one of the best RKC's in the business and genuinely cares about improving the RKC and helping others. When you take a stand on something, some people will be offended. Big deal? Get offended about people dying all over the world, not about a test being too hard or not too hard.
BTW, I have seen Dylan teach and he never puts anyone down. He works with people whatever their fitness level is and simply expects the best from them. Talk to anyone that has received intruction from him and you will find some excited people.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
will_fish: March 31 2005
|
|
RKC Snatch Test...
|
|
Comrades, I am attending the RKC Seminar in two weeks and I have reading what has been posted in regards to the Snatch Test over the last couple of days. I think that while some may feel the test is a good thing and some feel it is a bad thing, it is made clear what is expected of those who wish to attend in order to pass. I am sure that those who make up the criteria are wise enough to figure out what works and what doesn't, and will make changes when necessary. That being said, I would like to know what happens if you don't pass the Snatch Test? What sort of makeup (if any) is given? Is it similar to the situation where if you have minor technique flaws that you could make a video of yourself completing the test? Do you have to retake the whole seminar again? I was just wondering what the process was. I wish everyone attending good luck with the test And I will see you in two weeks.
Will
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
If you fail the test at the RKC you can meet up with a Senior RKC down the road for a re-test. Three of us are in SoCal, two on the east coast, one in the east, and one in the west.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
robv: March 31 2005
|
|
question for mike and pavel
|
|
i've noticed that pavel recommend the 3-5,3-5,3-5 for gaining strengh without mass. mike has out the 5x5 for strength and mass. is the difference in the rest peroid, and at what point does the change to building mass begin?
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
Really the key with any program is calorie consumption. If you eat a lot and do high rep bodyweight drills, you will put on weight. Of course that is not the most efficient way to go. To turn the 5x5 into more of a mass program, do it two times a week, take shorter breaks, (60-90 seconds) and increase the intensity (closer to failure). However, most importanly jack up the calories.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
robv: March 31 2005
|
|
question for mike and pavel
|
|
i've noticed that pavel recommend the 3-5,3-5,3-5 for gaining strengh without mass. mike has out the 5x5 for strength and mass. is the difference in the rest peroid, and at what point does the change to building mass begin?
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
However, if you goal is strength and size, then pick bells that you cannot press or push press. If your goal is to compete in GS, then start with 5x5 and work up to higher rep sets. Rally depends on what you are going for.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|
|
Question
|
C Maxwell: March 31 2005
|
|
Question for Mike Mahler
|
|
Mike, I was reading an earlier post of yours on calorie consumption and what type of rep scheme burns the most calories. From that post it looks like if I cut calories, I could do the old 3x10 set rep scheme and get the same results as doing 3x5 or 5x5. Is that true? If I'm wrong please give me the truth. BTW, I'm a big fan of yours and Pavels material. Thanks.
|
|
Answer
|
Mike Mahler: March 31 2005
|
|
Chris, I believe that losing fat has more to do with proper diet than training. In other words, you could follow a strength training regimen, cut calories and lose fat. However, HOC, tabata protocol, High intensity cardio etc will acccerate the process if your nutrition is in check. If your nutrition sucks, then forget about it. Now regarding your question, 3x10 will not give you the same strength results as 5x5. low reps and volume builds strength. 3x5 will build harder dense muscles than 3x10.
Mike Mahler
http://www.mikemahler.com
|
|
|